The sentence has a vague pronoun problem because it is unclear if the police officer or the criminal tripped and fell. In order to correct this, the sentence needs to be more specific. We can say any of the following sentences:
The police officer chased the criminal through the streets until <u>the officer </u>tripped and fell.
- It is clear that the officer fell.
The police officer chased the criminal through the streets until <u>the criminal </u>tripped and fell.
- It is clear the criminal fell.
This sentence wouldn't necessarily work with the original sentence since we can infer that only one of them fell because the writer used he. However, if both of them fell, it would be correct as well.
The police officer chased the criminal through the streets until <u>they</u> tripped and fell.
No. I don't believe he should not of helped her. He made a moral and individual decision. Hence "and of clay we are made"
No one person is better then the next. That you are no more measured nor different in moralization than he is in height and weight. This concludes what the author refers to and his bottom line means that if we as humans are made of clay one can be shaped and molded into good and that ones past doesn't set them in stone but of clay to be reshaped recreated
Answer: A
Explanation:
It explains in the passage that IQ can’t be determined/ explained.
I would say A because she gave someone a vase of flowers and i would think that a vase of flowers is a direct object.
