Answer:
<h2>The power of judicial review</h2>
Explanation/context:
Judicial review refers to the Supreme Court's ability to review any law to see if it violates the US Constitution. Marbury v. Madison (1803) is considered the landmark case for the Supreme Court asserting its authority of judicial review.
It was sort of a roundabout way in which the principle of judicial review was asserted by the Supreme Court in the case of Marbury v. Madison. William Marbury had been appointed Justice of the Peace for the District of Columbia by outgoing president John Adams -- one of a number of such last-minute appointments made by Adams. When Thomas Jefferson came into office as president, he directed his Secretary of State, James Madison, not to deliver many of the commission papers for appointees such as Marbury. Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court directly to hear his case, as a provision of the Judiciary Act of 1789 had made possible. The Court said that particular provision of the Judiciary Act was in conflict with Article III of the Constitution, and so they could not issue a specific ruling in Marbury's case (which they believe he should have won). Nevertheless, in making their statement about the case, the Court established the principle of judicial review.
Tenant farming mainly was used after the civil war to keep slaves poor. It stunted the growth of the south bye keeping a minority of people poor, without education and without opportunities. It really stopped all of the brain power and potential from the world that the black people held.
Answer:
A.) To Ensure Domestic Tranquility
Explanation:
Domestic Tranquility roughly translates to the peaceful relations among people of different ethnicities at the time. Integration was the inclusion of people of other races in otherwise all-white schools. It was a chaotic time and people of color were threatened for attending the same school as white people so Eisenhower sent state troops and police to defend and protect African Americans.
Answer:
<em>Natural rights are those that are not dependent on the laws or customs of any particular culture or government, and so are universal, fundamental and inalienable (they cannot be repealed by human laws, though one can forfeit their enjoyment through one's actions, such as by violating someone else's rights). Natural law is the law of natural rights.</em>
<em>Legal rights are those bestowed onto a person by a given legal system (they can be modified, repealed, and restrained by human laws). The concept of positive law is related to the concept of legal rights.</em>
Explanation:
Answer:
the principle that all people and institutions are subject to and accountable to law that is fairly applied and enforced; the principle of government by law
Explanation:
