Domestic slave workers perform a variety of household services for an individual or a family, from providing care and elderly dependents to house keeping, including cleaning and household maintenance. Other responsibilities may include cooking, laundry and ironing, shopping for food and undertaking other household errands. Such work has always needed to be done but before the Industrialrenovation and the advent of labour saving devices, it was physically much harder.
Could you put the link in the comments that way I can read it
The way that the Enlightenment’s theories of government viewed the role of government was that government was meant to serve the people, not the other way around.
Explanation:
The Enlightenment, or Age of Enlightenment, prepared politics and government in earth-shaking ideas. This cultural movement contained several types of philosophies or proposes to thinking about and investigating the world. Frequently, Enlightened philosophers considered impartially and without discrimination. Reasoning, rationalism, and empiricism were some of the schools of thought that constituted the Enlightenment.
Enlightenment philosophers John Locke, Charles Montesquieu, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau all formed theories of government in which some or even all the people would command. These scholars had an intense effect on the American and French revolutions and the representative governments that they invented.
Answer:
He wrote biographies about important historical figures and leaders.
Explanation:
Plutarch (a Greek Middle Platonist philosopher, priest at the Temple of Apollo and biographer) contribute to Hellenistic philosophy and the arts. He wrote biographies about important historical figures and leaders. Hellenistic philosophy refers to the period of Ancient Greek philosophy and Western philosophy.
Answer:
criminal investigation and court procedures
Explanation:
The common factor between the Mapp vs Ohio, Miranda vs Arizona and Gideon vs Wainwright was that they were all criminal investigation and court procedures.
In the Miranda vs Arizona case, the court ruled that the incriminating statements made by the accused were only admissible in court if the police informed the suspect of his Miranda rights first.
In the Mapp vs Ohio case, the court ruled that evidence obtained through violation of the Fourth Amendment which has to do with unlawful searches and seizures were not admissible in court.
During the Gideon vs Wainwright case, the court ruled that the states were bound by the Sixth Amendment to produce a lawyer for an accused if he cannot afford one.