1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lbvjy [14]
4 years ago
7

19. (05.04 MC) Question refers to the excerpt below. "While the law of competition may be sometimes hard for the individual, it

is best for the race, for it insures the survival of the fittest in every department."—Andrew Carnegie, from The Gospel of Wealth, 1889 Based on the quote, which of the following would Carnegie likely support? (5 points) Settlement house movement Social Gospel movement Social Darwinism Utopianism
History
1 answer:
Ne4ueva [31]4 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is: "Darwinism".

The concept of the survival of the fittest is central in the theory of the evolution of the species developed by Darwin. But it has also been applied many times in the economic sphere, for the defense of competiton and to promote the establishment of free markets.

The evolutionary theory states that those spices that develop favourable traits would be able to survive, while weak ones would extinguish. The same understanding is applied in economics, where those who are able to gain profit in the markets, given a certain endownments of inputs would suceed while those who are not able to obtain any profit would sink.

You might be interested in
why does the house members based on state population, why are representatives based on population? I am really confused
Stels [109]
Because the more people a state has, the more power it has (in relationship to all the other states). So, since it has a big population, it needs more representatives to represent how many people there are. idk if this helps :/ sorry
6 0
4 years ago
Why do you think some have defined nineteenth-century nationalism as a "secular religion"? Could it be viewed more as a God-give
Softa [21]

The correct answers to these open questions are the following.

I think some have defined nineteenth-century nationalism as a "secular religion" because it was so ingrained in people's minds that seemed like they professed a religion with their nationalistic ideas. Those nationalistic ideas were so ingrained that people defended them at all cost and were the cause of many differences, and conflicts, even wars.

I don't think this could be viewed more as a God-given right or power because God did not do these things. I considered that people felt they deserve to be more and have more. That is why they set these boundaries and did not accept other nations' culture, language, history, and traditions,

Regarding Guisseppe Mazzini, I think he can be considered nationalistic. An important Italian political figure of his time, he was a supporter and promoter of the revolutionary movement in Italy that tried to unite the dispersed territories.

5 0
3 years ago
How did religion influence the Egyptian government?
AlekseyPX

Answer:

the pharaoh was the head of state and the divine representative of the gods on earth. Religion and government brought order to society through the construction of temples, the creation of laws, taxation, the organization of labour, trade with neighbours and the defence of the country's interests.

Explanation:

welcome:)

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How might Japan be different today if the United States had not provided assistance after the war?
Katena32 [7]

It must be considered that with the assistance given by United States, they were not only helping people, but also sharing their culture and teaching Japanese thigs from the other side of the world that they didn't know. So, if US hadn't proveded assistance, it would've taken Japan way longer to recover after war, and they wouldn't have the same society they have nowadays, as it shows it is influenced in several ways by the American culture.

3 0
4 years ago
In _____, the supreme court ruled in plessy v. ferguson that there was nothing inherently discriminatory in separating the races
Dmitrij [34]

The correct answer in the space provided is 1896 as this is the year where the Supreme Court rule the Plessy v. Ferguson in which nothing inherently discriminatory in separating the races. The Plessy v. Ferguson is a landmark decision in which it is responsible for upholding the segregation laws for the public.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Type a brief outline, in your own words, naming the interpretation which you believe best reflects the facts of Daniel 9:25-27.
    11·1 answer
  • Who was responsible for the battle of Little Bighorn
    11·1 answer
  • What was the concept of one world or the unification of all people important to persia?
    7·1 answer
  • Which ruler moved the capital of the Roman Empire to Byzantium in the fourth century?
    12·2 answers
  • Which was the main three reasons for Spanish exploration of the “new world”
    9·2 answers
  • What was Muhammad's first revelation from the angel Gabriel? (1 point)
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following individuals would likely have had the MOST education in the medieval society? a. a villein's daughter. B.
    11·2 answers
  • What was the purpose to Declare independence
    15·2 answers
  • PLS HELP! Will Mark Brainliest
    15·2 answers
  • How could a focus on dimplomacy have helped the states of italy?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!