1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kobusy [5.1K]
3 years ago
15

I can't find either of these in my text book, please help! Which is an argument for free trade? (Points : 3) It encourages inter

national cooperation. It leads to peaceful resolutions of international conflicts. It protects fragile ecosystems. It provides jobs for workers in developed nations. Which is an argument against free trade? (Points : 3) It can limit environmental protection measures. It leads to international conflict. It increases the prices for many products. It violates basic economic principles.
History
2 answers:
Vedmedyk [2.9K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

It encourages international cooperation.

It can limit environmental protection measures.

Explanation:

Free trade is a common feature of modern societies. However, the advantages and disadvantages of it are not always clear. One of the advantages of free trade is that it encourages international cooperation. As countries exchange goods, they usually try to maintain a peaceful relationship. However, one argument against free trade is that is leads to a race to the bottom, as countries try to constantly be more competitive. This could lead to bad consequences, such as limiting environmental protection measures.

tiny-mole [99]3 years ago
3 0
1. It encourages international cooperation.
- true!

It leads to peaceful resolutions of international conflicts. - well, a bit, but only as an extension of the frist thing- so the frist one is a better option!

It protects fragile ecosystems. - nothing to do with that!

It provides jobs for workers in developed nations.  - not, rather in the developing nation



Which is an argument against free trade?
It can limit environmental protection measures. - i don't think this is a very good option, but its the best of those given. Let's say that one country prohibits production which is enviromentally harmful, but cheap: a free trade would challenge this deciosn.
It leads to international conflict. - no, i don't think so
It increases the prices for many products. -no, it rather decreases
It violates basic economic principles. - no, i don't think si
You might be interested in
Why did white southerners were against slavery?
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]
Because the South was mainly farms that had to be worked by hand, while the North was more industrialized and had more factories. The white Southerners did not want the slaves to be freed because they wouldn't have free labor and would be forced to pay workers to work their fields. 
6 0
3 years ago
Why the Italian city-states were so prosperous
Mashcka [7]
<span>they had many wealthy people backing them up and they funded the cities .</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Identify the countries overrun by Germany.
Ulleksa [173]
The german army invaded Greece, Netherlands<span>, </span>Belgium<span>, </span><span>, France, Denmark, </span>Yugoslavia, Luxembourg, Norway<span> and Western </span>Poland.
4 0
3 years ago
According Locke why would falsely people believe they do not have the right to use force ?
xeze [42]

Answer:

Like Hobbes, Locke believed that human nature allowed people to be selfish. This is apparent with the introduction of currency. In a natural state all people were equal and independent, and everyone had a natural right to defend his "life, health, liberty, or possessions".

Explanation:

Like Hobbes, Locke believed that human nature allowed people to be selfish. This is apparent with the introduction of currency. In a natural state all people were equal and independent, and everyone had a natural right to defend his "life, health, liberty, or possessions".

8 0
3 years ago
One conclusion a reader could make after reading the article is that Native 2 points
user100 [1]

Native American tribes had treaties violated and were forcibly removed from their homes by the U.S. government

Option: A

Explanation:

U.S government forcefully removed native Americans from their land. Native Americans refers to those who lived in the continent from their initiation. Their culture, tradition was different from the general public of United States. U.S government behave with them in a very brutal way and compelled them to leave their native place forcefully.

But still now they exist. At present they are facing educational challenges. They are not getting adequate facilities, qualified teachers, willing students to do more higher studies. Maximum students are dropping out their education in the mid of school.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was the Black Panther Party considered “radical” in the Civil Rights era?
    11·2 answers
  • Why did Texas cattle ranchers want to sell their cattle to people living in the North and East? A. The supply was greater in the
    5·1 answer
  • The cabinet in the uk government
    12·2 answers
  • Name 2 United States senators that represent texas
    9·2 answers
  • 30 points!!!!/ Make 6 comments like how you feel, any questions you have, or if you agree or disagree.
    13·1 answer
  • Explain why communism decline in the ussr?
    5·1 answer
  • Which monarch gave Sir Walter Raleigh permission to create the first English colony in North America? A. Henry VIII B. Charles I
    7·2 answers
  • Hehehehehehehehehehehehehehe<br> he
    10·2 answers
  • Aristotle believed that the citizens of a successful state must
    15·1 answer
  • Women were granted the right to vote: a. at the same time discrimination based on race was prohibited. b. 50 years before discri
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!