Answer:
The answer is D.efficiency and effectiveness
Explanation:
Interpretive claims is not necessary in a historical essay.
<u>Answer:</u> Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
A historical essay is defined as an essay illustrating assertions about historic events that are substantiated by adequate evidence to give the viewers a greater clarity and knowledge of that specific event.
Interpretive claims are points of view which are explored and evaluated in an essay. Although interpretive claims could be well-versed and advocated by historical record, it is regarded subjective since the writer uses it to voice their opinion. They are not essential for a historical essay because those claims represent the writer's opinion or perception of an event or topic that is not far mandated in a historical essay.
This is a question asking a personal opinion, so I'll give you mine.
I believe the literature from this period influenced the future generations of American Literature is it taught us to be independent, to stand up against those who simply expect us to follow like mindless sheep. It influenced literature by showing everyone that their opinion matters, even against your authority, and that has influenced books and passages heavily since.
Traces of these themes can be seen everywhere. Authors from all over make books about how standing up is the best thing to do, and how being independent is important. Books, passages, texts, websites, etc all preach this. This is presented in various situations where independence is important.
~Hope this helps m8!
The worked at a crop farm like tobacco or Cotten
The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
-Goebbels says he favors "rule by the best." Do you think he clearly defines what he means by "the best"?
I think that Goebbels does not clearly define his term, but the reader can understand that the strong dictators are the ones that are best suited to rule the people.
I can cite a specific detail from the text to support my answer. It would be the paragraph that says "A minority, if it includes the best, will turn the German fate."
-I think Goebbel's real passion here is to defend the idea of "rule by the best." However, he takes his chances to critique democracy.
A specific example of his language and rhetoric would be this: "The people have the choice to live under the open dictatorship of the courageous or to die under the hypocritical democracy of cowards."
Joseph Goebbels was the ideologist during Adolph Hitlers' leadership. He was the master of propaganda that helped Hitler to become the kind of leader he was, conveying the proper propaganda to convince the German people.
