Answer:
Meredith and Hunter-Gault were both in danger from gun violence at their schools.
Hunter-Gault was under constant threat, while Meredith felt mostly safe at his school.
Both faced resistance at their schools, but Meredith was in a great deal of
Explanation:
compare to James Meredith’s experiences at the University of Mississippi?
Both were welcomed into their schools and found little opposition to desegregation.
Meredith and Hunter-Gault were both in danger from gun violence at their schools.
Hunter-Gault was under constant threat, while Meredith felt mostly safe at his school.
Both faced resistance at their schools, but Meredith was in a great deal of danger
down because they wouldn't bring as many sword fish if the price wasn't high
Answer:
enumeration technique
Explanation:
Enumeration is a technique used in speech, a rhetorical device, for listing details or components of a thing in the form of mentioning words or phrases step by step. In this way a subject is further buttressed. Speakers and writers alike use enumeration to elaborate on a topic, and make it much clearer for the readers, avoiding ambiguity.
<span>The difference is approximately $15,000 per year. High school graduates tend to earn quite a bit less than their college-educated counterparts. This discrepancy only increases as the levels of education discrepancies increase, as well. Students with graduate degrees earn quite a bit more than those with undergraduate degrees.</span>
Answer: D) Sacrifice the soundness of a decision in order to achieve interpersonal harmony
Explanation: Group thinking involves more and more diverse suggestions for solving a problem, as there are multiple different attitudes and views within the group. It can also mean many different possible solutions, so the option to choose the best ones. There may also be a situation where the objective best solution is often not chosen in order to reach a compromise among the members of the group, because in the group one must always count on vanities and egos. It can also lead to slow and often ineffective decision making until all the solutions offered are reviewed. However, the worst-case scenario is to intentionally sacrifice the right solution for the sake of interpersonal harmony. This means that the group essentially did not meet to find the best solution, but to treat the excessive vanities and egos of its members.
