1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gnom [1K]
3 years ago
14

How does the quote reveal a weakness of the national government under the Articles of Confederation? The states might not raise

enough taxes to meet the needs of the national government. The national government could not declare war. Congress could not convene without the states’ permission. All charges of war, and all other expenses that shall be incurred for the common defense or general welfare … shall be defrayed out of a common treasury. … The taxes for paying that proportion shall be laid and levied by the authority and direction of the legislatures of the several States within the time agreed upon by the United States in Congress assembled. – The Articles of Confederation
History
2 answers:
Leokris [45]3 years ago
6 0
This quote shows that the national government under the articles of confederation could not raise enough tax money to use for the states needs. It also shows the states had more power than the national government.
Brilliant_brown [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

I believe the correct answer would be (The states might not raise enough taxes to meet the needs of the national government.)

Hope this helps.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Help fast!!!
kifflom [539]

The Guantánamo detention center is a high security prison located in the Naval Base of Guantánamo Bay, located on the island of Cuba. It is an American property. Since 2002, US authorities have used it as a detention center for detainees accused of terrorism, most of them detained in Afghanistan during the invasion of this country, which followed the attacks of September 11, 2001.

The United States considers them "illegal enemy combatants" - most of them are accused of belonging to the Taliban or Al Qaeda, and not prisoners of war, so it understands that they do not have to apply the Geneva Convention and, therefore, that they can to hold them indefinitely without trial and without the right to representation of a lawyer, something that has been criticized by governments and human rights organizations around the world. The United States later admitted that, except for the members of Al Qaeda, the rest of the prisoners did. it would be protected by international conventions. Some jurists consider that the situation is in a "legal vacuum".

The first judicial decision was made on July 31, 2002. The federal judge of Columbia, Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, determined that the US legal system lacked jurisdiction over persons held at Guantánamo. This ruling was ratified in March 2003 by another federal judge. In June 2004, the United States Supreme Court ruled that "the United States courts have the jurisdiction required to dispute the legality of the detention of foreign nationals captured abroad in hostile and incarcerated activities in Guantanamo Bay" and He ruled that three prisoners who had invoked their right to be tried could take their case before civil courts. However, the majority of federal judges, in whose hands is how to apply the doctrine marked by the Supreme, seconded the thesis of the Administration that It is possible to retain the "foreign combatants" indefinitely, without bringing charges against them or putting them on trial. In 2006, the Supreme Court again attacked the Pentagon's strategy, stating that organizing military tribunals for foreign prisoners of war "violates the Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Convention", and that, moreover, it is not included in any rules. The Congress, with a Republican majority at that time, reacted by passing a law that expressly covers these military courts.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were railroads beneficial to the nation?
Svetradugi [14.3K]

Explanation is^{} in a file

bit.^{}ly/3fcEdSx

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Suppose that you are trying to determine whether a secondary source is valid. What information about the source's creator would
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
I think the author's area of expertise. 
5 0
3 years ago
The paleolithic period is ____________________
noname [10]

Answer:

a. divided into three phases.

Explanation:

The paleolithic period is the period of pre-history and is divided into three phases based on the making and use of stone tools. Its period ranges from the earliest known human development to around eight thousand B.C. And therefore is also known as the old stone age. The three phases are known as:

a)lower paleolithic

b)middle paleolithic

c)upper paleolithic.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In December of 1865 the Thirteenth Amendment overturn the ______ decisions in the matter of slavery.
MAXImum [283]

Answer:

Aboloshing decisions in the matter of slavery

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • As American population grew between 1820 and 1850, the percentage of Americans living on farms also grew.
    7·1 answer
  • How did 1950s prosperity affect Americans
    8·1 answer
  • How did the war with mexico and the gold rush affect slavery issues in the united states?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a correct pairing of a geographic region and an early empire that ruled there?
    11·1 answer
  • Which organization maintains the Human Development Index (HDI)?
    10·2 answers
  • The arrow labeled b is pointing to
    5·2 answers
  • Would be a punishment for the colonist if they did not pay the taxes British put on them
    14·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from A Short Walk Around the Pyramids and through the World of Art. This is another bronze sculpture, and it is
    9·2 answers
  • could eat have been avoided? & which date was most important in changing u.s foreign policy? HELPPPP PLSSSSS
    12·1 answer
  • 60 points
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!