All categories

3 years ago

How did the colonists react the proclamation of 1763

History

1 answer:

Agata [3.3K]3 years ago

3 0

<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>

The year 1763 was essential in American and European history. The British had quite recently won a noteworthy war and expanded the extent of their massive realm. The Proclamation of 1763 was to encourage peace, yet it propelled solid sentiments among American colonists.

The Proclamation of 1763 infuriated American colonists raised pressures among them and the British government. The Proclamation closed off all land west of the Appalachian Mountains from American settlement and put it aside as Native American domain.

From the British point of view, it was imperative to have great relations with Native Americans. The British had quite recently won the Seven Years' War, or the French and Indian War as it's known in the U.S., however it cost the British a ton of cash and left them in a debilitated state to shield their immense realm.

From the settlers' point of view, be that as it may, the Proclamation was selling out. The pioneers needed to extend west of the Appalachians and some of them had been allowed land by the British government as a reward for serving in the war.

The Proclamation rendered those land awards futile and prevented aggressive pilgrims from moving westbound. The British government's choice helped set the phase for rising American turmoil during the 1770s.

You might be interested in

What was the military strategy behind island hopping? Was it successful

xenn [34]

Answer:

The strategy behind island-hopping was one involving a progressive approach towards Japan achieved through the capture of important island bases. It was successful in that it provided many airfields from which US forces could attack Japan and, ultimately, end the war.

3 0

3 years ago

A: Hina has milk and cereal during her breakfast, which is a heterogeneous mixture.R: In a heterogeneous mixture, the components

S_A_V [24]

A homogenous mixture is that mixture in which the components mix with each other and its composition is uniform throughout the solution. A heterogenous mixture is that mixture in which the composition is not uniform throughout and different components are observed.

So it would be a heterogenous mixture

5 0

3 years ago

During the 1920s more than a million blacks moved from the South to cities in the North. Which was not a result of that migratio

Alinara [238K]

The Correct answer and will be mark brainlest

The answer will be d. Am honest. Answer my quisten and it will be 5000 points for u. I have 90000 S plz mark brainlest! Am telling the truth! Am always honest. Plz mark brainlest!

Explanation:

6 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why is the transition away from latin significant

Shalnov [3]

Answer:

ment with politics generally band party politics in particular as the virtues of citizens

8 0

3 years ago

Need some help ASAP!!!!!

serious [3.7K]

Answer:

Explanation:

Reasons given in support of Manifest Destiny are:

1. "It's an American right to stretch from sea to shining sea." This implies that it is the natural right of the United States to expand from the East Coast to the West Coast, or from the Atlantic to the Pacific, as they may see fit.

2. "We (Americans) also have a responsibility to civilian this beautiful land." This implies that Americans should take over and expose the inhabitants of the territory to civilizations and advanced cultures

3. "The American claim is by the right of our manifest to overspread and to possess the whole of the continent which providence has given for the development of the great experiment of liberty and federative self-government entrusted to us." This implies that it is true God's power and influence that the Americans are entrusted to overspread and possess another territory.

Reasons given in Rejection of Manifest Destiny are:

1. "America has no right to take the land west of Louisiana territory. Those lands are rightfully owned by Mexico." This implies that there is no constitutional right for America to possess such land.

2. "To enter into conflict with the Mexicans just to expand and take that land would violate the principles of this nation." This implies that taking over such territory is against the tenets of democracy and American values.

3. " They were really after gold." This implies that the purpose of the American expansion is not to civilize the inhabitants and the territory but to exploit them to their advantage.

4. "Many Indians died for that." This implies that such expansion in the past has only lead to the death of the inhabitants rather than save them. Because often it led to conflicts and wars resulting in the death of many native Indians.

5 0

3 years ago