Answer:
10-3×(6×-2)
Explanation:
i think its wrong im not sure but i give my all best in my answer
SO PLEASS MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST ANSWER
1."basagan ng palayok" (hit the pot), a game similar to mexico's piñata, is a popular game here in the philippines during town fiestas and other festivities. the main objective of the game is to hit the pot that was tied overhead by a contestant which is blindfolded.
2basagang palayok it gives enjoyment because ,theres a bonding to others
It is false that the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions poses few threats to sustaining economic growth in developing countries.
Given that the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions poses few threats to sustaining economic growth in developing countries.
We are required to say whether the statement is true or false.
Economic growth basically defined as the increase or improvement in the inflation-adjusted market value of the goods and services produced by an economy over a certain period of time.
The reduction of carbon dioxide emissions does not poses threats but benefits our country and in result lead to increase in economic growth of the countries.
Hence it is false that the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions poses few threats to sustaining economic growth in developing countries.
Learn more about economic growth at brainly.com/question/1690575
#SPJ4
The testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests is:
- The reason for this is that the prior events serve as impermissible character evidence.
<h3>What is irrelevant evidence?</h3>
Irrelevant evidence is the type of evidence that does not apply to the issue at hand and can cause a distortion of the facts.
In the case of the police officer in question, the evidence that he wants to present will cause confusion about the issues and possibly mislead the jury.
Learn more about irrelevant evidence here:
brainly.com/question/1865742
#SPJ1
Complete question:
A man has sued a police officer, alleging that the officer violated the man's civil rights by using excessive force while arresting him. At trial, the officer admits to having hit the man in the head with the butt of his gun but contends that the force was necessary because the man was resisting arrest. In support of his contention, the officer seeks to introduce evidence that the man had resisted arrest on three prior occasions during the last 10 years.
Is this testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests admissible?
