Answer:
1.Credibility, accuracy, reasonableness, and support
2.No author listed, no supporting institutions, the author has been controversial or negatively reviewed in the past, the writing is poor or contains errors
3.Is the information fair and balanced, objective, realistic, and consistent?
4.In order to determine whether the author's claims are true and reliable, it's important to know where the author got his or her facts and statistics, and whether these are supported by the majority of experts in his or her field.
To begin, Brutus’s speech was formal and more directed to the Romans. In his introduction, he starts with “Romans, countrymen, and lovers!” This was used to join everyone together and later help him justify Caesar’s death. Throughout the text, he describes Caesar as an “ambitious” man. Calling Caesar ambitious makes it seem that Caesar only thought about himself. On the other hand, Antony’s speech was more personal and sarcastic. In contrary to Brutus he opens his speech with “Friends, Romans, countrymen…”. This sets up his later statements of being Caesar’s friend. Throughout his speech, he uses paralipsis and repetition to poke at Brutus but at the same time save Caesar’s reputation. Throughout Antony’s speech, he uses devices, tactics, and his sympathy to his advantage. Brutus only had one point, which was that he killed Caesar for Rome, to stand on. All in all, Antony’s speech was better and more persuasive than Brutus's.
Answer:
The Giver is influenced by his transfer of memories to Jonas in several significant ways. The Giver is physically and emotionally influenced by the transfer of memories. The Giver feels exhausted after transferring the memories. The Giver also feels lighter, as if a weight has been lifted from him. He also feels relieved when Jonas receives difficult memories but feels guilty for hurting Jonas. The Giver also loses the ability to see in color and forgets past experiences.
Explanation:
Answer:
i wanna say the 3rd option, so it would be 179,900
Explanation:
I am not 100% sure though...
Explanation:
The electoral college can be understood as a group of people chosen to represent voters and appoint the president and vice president every four years.
Therefore, each State has a number of delegates corresponding to and proportionate to its population and to the deputies and senators of that State, and so each delegate is represented by one vote and each candidate needs to obtain a number corresponding to 270 or more to be elected.
This system was created in conjunction with the American constitution and had the central objective of allowing greater control over voting due to the precarious communication at the time, and there is also a predilection for the electoral college by smaller states, which feel more represented in the use of this system.
However, there is still a very long delay in the counting of votes and perhaps this system may not reflect the will of the majority of the population, since even if a candidate has a greater number of total votes, he cannot win the contest if he does not win in the delegates.
It is interesting that there is a restructuring of this American electoral system, duly voted by the population to choose whether direct voting would be a faster and more democratic option.
An idea of modernization would be the adoption of a voting system by electronic ballot boxes, with high anti-fraud protection and greater speed and security in the counting of votes and results.
