1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
FrozenT [24]
3 years ago
14

Which sentence best describes the relationship between the historical context (Malaga Island's history) and the novel? The novel

's plot and setting are closely based on real historical events. The novel dramatically changes historical events. The novel shows no evidence that the author is aware of historical events. The novel recounts historical events exactly as they happened.
History
2 answers:
I am Lyosha [343]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer is A) the novel’s plot and setting are closely base don real historical events.

<em>The sentence that best describes the relationship between the historical context of Malaga’s Island history and the novel is that the novel’s plot and setting are closely based on real historical events. </em>

The novel is based on a true story that happened in the Malaga Island in Southern Main, in 1912.

In that year, 45 African American residents of Malaga Island were expelled from the Island by the state of Main. The reason: racism, economic, and eugenics. The community that used to live in that place disappeared.

tankabanditka [31]3 years ago
6 0

A is the right answer

You might be interested in
Sanitation standards are part of a state's responsibility to protect public infrastructure. Public health. Public safety. Public
Anton [14]

The correct answer is: "public health".

The Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures are applied to food production with the aim of making sure that the manufacturing processes employed do not mean a threaten to human health.

These standard procedures are a prerequisite established in the Hazard analysis and critical control points, or HACCP, a preventive approach introduced with the ultimate goal of achieving food safety, which means that the final food products and their production processes are free of  biological, chemical, and physical hazards.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How are humans influenced by Prometheus decision to defy Jupiter?
mylen [45]

Answer:

Humans benefit from Prometheus’ decision to defy Jupiter because they gain fire, and Prometheus teaches them how to cook, protect themselves, and make tools. The humans become more civilized and get rid of their animal-like ways. As a result of Prometheus’ actions, humankind becomes happy once again.

Make sure to sum it up and put it in your own words, have an awesome day!

3 0
3 years ago
Name two journalists who practiced yellow journalism
miskamm [114]

William Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer :)

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
n 1853 U.S. Commodore Matthew Perry anchored his fleet off the coast of Tokyo. What was the purpose of this action?
Wittaler [7]
The United States and the Opening to Japan<span>, 1853. On July 8, 1853, American Commodore Matthew Perry led his four ships into the harbor at Tokyo Bay, seeking to re-establish for the first time in over 200 years regular </span>trade<span> and discourse between </span>Japan<span> and the western world.
</span>
-hope this helps:)
6 0
3 years ago
How did the fugitive slave law serve to strengthen the south? Pls tell me
LenaWriter [7]

Answer:

The Fugitive Slave Acts were a pair of federal laws that allowed for the capture and return of runaway slaves within the territory of the United States. Enacted by Congress in 1793, the first Fugitive Slave Act authorized local governments to seize and return escaped slaves to their owners and imposed penalties on anyone who aided in their flight. Widespread resistance to the 1793 law led to the passage of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which added more provisions regarding runaways and levied even harsher punishments for interfering in their capture. The Fugitive Slave Acts were among the most controversial laws of the early 19th century. Statutes regarding refugee slaves existed in America as early as 1643 and the New England Confederation, and slave laws were later enacted in several of the 13 original colonies. Among others, New York passed a 1705 measure designed to prevent runaways from fleeing to Canada, and Virginia and Maryland drafted laws offering bounties for the capture and return of escaped slaves.

By the time of the Constitutional Convention in 1787, many Northern states including Vermont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Connecticut had abolished slavery.

Concerned that these new free states would become safe havens for runaway slaves, Southern politicians saw that the Constitution included a “Fugitive Slave Clause.” This stipulation (Article 4, Section 2, Clause 3) stated that, “no person held to service or labor” would be released from bondage in the event they escaped to a free state. Despite the inclusion of the Fugitive Slave Clause in the U.S. Constitution, anti-slavery sentiment remained high in the North throughout the late 1780s and early 1790s, and many petitioned Congress to abolish the practice outright.

Bowing to further pressure from Southern lawmakers—who argued slave debate was driving a wedge between the newly created states—Congress passed the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793.

This edict was similar to the Fugitive Slave Clause in many ways, but included a more detailed description of how the law was to be put into practice. Most importantly, it decreed that slave owners and their “agents” had the right to search for escaped slaves within the borders of free states.

In the event they captured a suspected slave, these hunters had to bring them before a judge and provide evidence proving the person was their property. If court officials were satisfied by their proof—which often took the form of a signed affidavit—the owner would be permitted to take custody of the slave and return to their home state. The law also imposed a $500 penalty on any person who helped harbor or conceal escaped slaves.

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 was immediately met with a firestorm of criticism. Northerners bristled at the idea of turning their states into a stalking ground for bounty hunters, and many argued the law was tantamount to legalized kidnapping. Some abolitionists organized clandestine resistance groups and built complex networks of safe houses to aid slaves in their escape to the North.

Explanation:

basically: Following increased pressure from Southern politicians, Congress passed a revised Fugitive Slave Act in 1850. Part of Henry Clay's famed Compromise of 1850—a group of bills that helped quiet early calls for Southern secession—this new law forcibly compelled citizens to assist in the capture of runaway slaves.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on acco
    13·2 answers
  • Which is the indian tribe who fought the u.s. army in attempt to reach canada and freedom ?
    8·2 answers
  • The March 1917 Revolution in Russia began when __________. A. Taxpayers were angered over tax increases to pay for the war B. Mi
    7·1 answer
  • Read your textbook's “Sources from the Past” section on Christopher Columbus’ first impressions of American peoples. Answer the
    11·1 answer
  • What started an organization for farmers that came to be known as grange
    6·1 answer
  • In your own words, what have you learned about the election process for U.S. President throughout the campaign of 2020?
    15·1 answer
  • What 2 countries proven, over and over they did not have the stomach for a fight ?
    15·1 answer
  • The Puerto Rico trench is located between the islands of
    10·1 answer
  • GIVING BRAINLIST!!!))
    7·1 answer
  • The southern economy expanded during the Civil War. Unlike the northern states, the southern states were completely self suffici
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!