Compare and contrast the theories of Locke and Descartes. On what points do these two philosophers agree? On what points do they
disagree? Pay close attention to their views on how human intellect is acquired. Your answer should consist of 100 to 250 words. You must use textual evidence to support your points. Be sure to introduce that evidence properly and use quotation marks appropriately. Clearly note the author to whom you are referring. Hint: You could write one paragraph comparing their theories and then a second paragraph that illustrates their contrasting points of view.
<span>In this answer I will provide you with the main hints that can help you to write a compare&contrast essay on your own.
1) How the ideas of Descartes and Locke were similar? Their common subject of philosophical studying was to get to know what the real knowledge was. Both of them focused on this question, trying to find out whether the mind and body took part in obtaining of knowledge.
2) How did their ideas differ? First of all, Descartes was a<span> rationalist, which means that he thought that knowledge of the world could be achieved by exercise of reason. As an empiricist, Locke believed that such knowledge could only be gained through the senses.</span></span>
Although not technically wrong, the other choices aren't the best synonyms, and they take away from the paragraph. Since bullying can have drastic negative effects, the best word would be "destructive" instead of simply saying "unhelpful." Destructive has the most negative connotation.
(4<span>) Donovan McNabb is a high profile football player because he is a good quarterback.
This sentence does not belong in the paragraph because it has nothing to do with the advantages and disadvantages of a professional football player, but instead talks about one. </span>
