1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
svp [43]
4 years ago
5

Did the allies lay the seeds for future problems in the peace settlement of 1919?​

History
2 answers:
bekas [8.4K]4 years ago
8 0
Yea they did. They blamed everything on Germany and wanted them to pay for the damage caused. There were also a lot of rules set in place for example that they could only have a limited military and no Air Force. All of these things brought Germany into a Great Depression which eventually led to Hitler gaining control. The tension the treaty caused eventually set the stage for the beginning of world war 2. You could even argue that is the same war just separate half’s.
Anastasy [175]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Yes, it is unfortunate but it´s true.

Explanation:

Many provisions of the Treaty of Versailles were too harsh and amounted to a huge humilliation of Germany. In the first place, it imposed severe limitations on the size of the German army, on its types and system of weapons and established a demilitarized zone along the Franco-German border in the Rhineland. Secondly, it included a so-called "guilty clause" that blamed Germany for starting WWI; this was particularly outrageous and unfair in the eyes of the German people, causing much resentment. Thirdly, the gigantic war reparations demanded by the Allies also became a motive of deep dissatisfaction; due to huge economic troubles in the 1920s, the German postwar governments stop paying them. So, all of these factors and unfortunate demands sowed the seeds of a new conflict.  

You might be interested in
Is it possible to call or email the White House?
lisabon 2012 [21]
No, please mark brainly
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was the term southerners used for a white southerner who tried to overturn the changes of Reconstruction?
stepladder [879]

The correct answer is C. Redeemer

Explanation:

In U.S. history, the Reconstruction (1863-1877) was the period that followed the Amerian Civil War and during which important social changes and changes in civil rights occurred; indeed during the Reconstruction rights were guaranteed to free slaves and those states that had belonged to the Confederacy were integrated again. However, these changes were still opposed by some, especially by those that lived in the south and wanted to preserved the traditions  and white supremacy that existed before the Civil War and because of this the Redeemers were created which refer to a coalition of those white southerners that oppose the changes of the Reconstruction and aimed at getting power and continue with the white supremacy stopping the changes of the Reconstruction, also they oppose the carpetbagger and scalawags that supported the Reconstruction. Therefore, the term used to refer to the southerners that tired to overturn the changes of the Reconstruction was Redeemers.

8 0
3 years ago
Muslim armies invaded Ghana’s frontier region and weakened Ghana’s power cause
Ivahew [28]

A because it took it o usatestprep


6 0
4 years ago
______ is the political scientist and author of Democracy in America.he believed the the delegation of government to the states
VashaNatasha [74]

Hello,

The correct answer in which you are looking for is C. Alexis de Tocqueville.

Please mark brainliest.

-Austin

4 0
3 years ago
Describe the history of political parties in Texas?
Helen [10]

Answer: If we can say something about the history of political parties in Texas, it is that the Democratic party had a leading role in it if we don't take into account the Recontruction time in Texas

Explanation: the Reconstruction can be described as follows: for nine years following the Civil War, Texas was in turmoil, as its people attempted to solve political, social, and economic problems produced by the war. One of the major forces that threatened change in the state was the United States Army. Federal troops began entering the state in late May 1865. Their commanders believed that their duty, at least in part, was to ensure loyal government and to protect the rights of the blacks who were free as a result of the war. Except for an interlude during Reconstruction, the Democratic party was the leading political party in Texas until the 1960s. In the nineteenth century, however, the Whig, American (Know-Nothing), Republican, Greenback, and People's partiesqv provided at different times a formidable opposition, so that Texas did not become a real one-party state until after 1900, when the Republican party sank into insignificance and minor parties largely disappeared.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the main cause of the increasing revolts against white settlers by Native Americans?
    7·2 answers
  • The puzzle about quasar spectra, which was finally solved by maarten schmidt, was
    13·1 answer
  • the states have______ powers that are the constitution does not grant to the national government but does not deny to the states
    14·2 answers
  • Why did the church resist changes during the middle ages and the renaissance that contributed to the scientific revolution?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements best describes the action that ultimately ended public support for Senator McCarthy’s investig
    6·1 answer
  • (ASAP) What duty of a Sumerian king does Gilgamesh do?
    8·2 answers
  • What subjects did boys stusy at school?
    13·2 answers
  • Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen"The representatives of the French
    5·1 answer
  • 05.03 MC)What did Roman women and Roman slaves have in common? Both were expected to marry at a very young age. Both were expect
    6·1 answer
  • Please help
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!