Hello there,
Your correct answer would be Elected officials rewarded their supporters with jobs.
Hope this helps.
A.) is your correct answer.
~Jurgen
Answer:
European Partitioning
Explanation:
I took this test well answer
The colony is not officially added to the imperialist empire but must answer to it, method of imperial control is described.
<h3>What is
imperialism?</h3>
Imperialism is a form of rule in which a country reigns over other countries by sending military officers or exerting economic or political control over them. This was a very typical occurrence throughout history all over the planet.
The country controlled the colonies in one way or another in all three types of imperialist systems, whether through military, economic, or political means.
Thus, option B is correct.
For more details about imperialism, click here:
brainly.com/question/13762734
#SPJ1
The correct statement is that the United States wanted to become the world's first example of superpower. So, the correct option that matches the statement quoted above is D.
The United States of America had to set an example of being a superpower by building a superior army. All the other reasons substituted it well.
<h3>The US defense system </h3>
- US had faced some warfare during the Twentieth Century. It was a growing nation, but that led to it being under the radar of enemies all the time during the period.
- It had already been attacked by the powers like Russia, Japanese navy and had bad relations with all the nations belonging to the Soviet Union.
- To control the unwanted attacks by the help of army and military men, the spending of US defense department were increased during the Cold War era.
Hence, the correct option is D that the USA wanted to become an example of world's first superpower for the reason it being building a stronger defense system.
Learn more about US defense system here:
brainly.com/question/831371
I am going to assume here you are referring to the 'Scramble of Africa' that happened in the second half of the 19th century, as the European power did not really control the African regions before then.
The methods contexts did differ per colonising power and colonised region, but it boils down to the following factors:
- superior firepower, equipment and recourses; having better guns, armour, communication technology, and supply routes, made the Europeans a formidable enemy that the various tribes simply could not counter.
- co-opting the local elites; a tried and tested method for centuries, this has always been the way smart conquerers could maintain control over a region with minimal fuss and expenditur.
<span>- divide and conquer; conflict between the many tribes of Africa has been a constant for centuries in the continent. The Europeans could easily manipulate the various tribes against each other to prevent a unified resistance from rising up. </span>
<span>- a willingness to use extreme forms of terror; the Europeans might have been all high and mighty back home about their Enlightment and democracy, but in Africa they were more than willing to use forms of terror that would make most contemporary dictators feel a little uneasy. Case in point, the widespread killing and mutilation when quotas were not met in king Leopold II's Congo.</span>
