Answer:
It is not unconstitutional
Explanation:
First of all, the constitution gives you freedom to practice religion, and I'm pretty sure you don't need to go to church to practice religion. Also, the freedom of religion has limits, the same way freedom of speech has limits. There are so many aspects to religion besides going to church. You can pray, read holy text, and join virtual services. Also, WE ARE IN A PANDEMIC!! It is a danger to yourself and others to be out and about during these times. The need to go to church is not the most necessary part of a religion. The ten commandments in Christianity (I'm getting evidence from Christianity because that is the community that is complaining the most) say nothing about having to go to church on Sundays because God knows not everybody has the privilege to go to Church every Sunday. So in summary, no, it is not unconstitutional to prevent indoor, in-person church services.
The attack was well planned, well executed and caught the US by surprise.
Japan had been at war with China for several years and had a fairly large number of highly trained and experienced aircrews from which the elite was chosen for the attack. This elite force was able to maximize the damage inflicted on the allies for the size of the committed force for months after the attack.
Japanese intelligence was excellent concerning the layout of Pearl Harbor and the location of ships within it. Literally, they were able to plan in detail and rehearse the attack numerous times to get it right.
Japan's intelligence information on Pearl Harbor allowed them to make innovations that proved vital to the attack. For example, they knew Pearl Harbor was too shallow for their standard aerial torpedo, so they devised a modification to keep them from going too deep when dropped. "Battleship Row" in Pearl Harbor included an inner and outer row of ships, the outer row could be hit by torpedoes but the inner ones could not. The Japanese fitted fins to armor-piercing shells and used them as bombs for attacking the inner row of battleships.
The US was just installing radar at Pearl Harbor and as yet had not developed a system for reporting and intercepting incoming aircraft. The attacking force was picked up on radar and reported while still well out to sea. The junior officer receiving the report famously told the radar operators to "not worry about it" since he assumed the incoming force was 12 B-17s flying to Pearl Harbor that day from the mainland.
Answer:
1. "US" Rooster
2. Country "Little roosters"
3. "Monroe Doctrine" Coop
Explanation: US Rooster: Us has gained independence and is now a proud and prosperous country. That is why it is so large.
Little Roosters: The little roosters all represent countries in South America.
European "Coop": This represents the Monroe Doctrine, which warned the Europeans against attack/colonizing the newly freed Americans. That is why they are held back by the coop.
Answer:considering that andrew jackson was a unfit president because of the native dilemma.
Explanation:
he ordered the natives to be taken to a smaller confined peice of land this process was called "the trail of tears"
The age of voting is one qualification that cannot be changed by the states. It is actually a federal procedure and the states do not have the right to alter it.The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the last option. I hope that this is the answer you were looking for and it helped you.