Sure,
Answer:
He said to her if he was really that easy to forget.
-> the sentence involved in this direct speech is a question. "he said to her" does not need to be changed. sentence structure of the question needs to be changed, not like your usual indirect speech sentences.
then, add a if after "he said to her". remember, this is a question.
the word in the sentence, "was" is not a modal verb, therefore it will not be changed. however, of course the word place needs to be switched with the pronoun "he", as we're converting it to a sentence and not a question. so, "if he was really that easy to forget".
The correct match of the sentence with one that has been revised to include a descriptive adjective:
- She has a dog: Elise has a chocolate brown Labrador retriever.
- There was a tree in the yard: The pine tree quickly shed its green, sticky needles all over the yard.
- The trees were covered in ice: The ice frosting each of the branches sparkled joyously in the shining sun.
- The lasagna was good: Each bite was filled with gooey mozzarella cheese and fresh tomato.
- We ate dessert: The ice frosting each of the branches sparkled joyously in the shining sun..
<h3>What are adjectives?</h3>
Adjectives are the words that tell about the quality of words. For example: The roses are so pretty.
Thus, the correct match are:
- She has a dog: Elise has a chocolate brown Labrador retriever.
- There was a tree in the yard: The pine tree quickly shed its green, sticky needles all over the yard.
- The trees were covered in ice: The ice frosting each of the branches sparkled joyously in the shining sun.
- The lasagna was good: Each bite was filled with gooey mozzarella cheese and fresh tomato.
- We ate dessert: The ice frosting each of the branches sparkled joyously in the shining sun.
Learn more about adjectives
brainly.com/question/11385993
#SPJ1
I’m not sure about 2 and 3 but number 1 is
two stanzas, each 4 lines
When you're arguing you want to make your point as objective as possible, for this you have to be impartial so that your proof is strong.
Comparing the opposite side's views to something unpleasant is useless since this kind of comparison holds no proof that your argument is true. <em>Incorrect</em>
If you include only general details the audience will understand, you might not be able to communicate the specific points of your argument, therefore you wouldn't be able to prove it is accurate. <em>Incorrect</em>
To make your argument effective you have to use specific details to refute the opposite side's views. That way you'll present the specific points in which your argument will stand, you will communicate logical and objective ideas about your argument and they will work to prove it. <u><em>Correct</em></u>
If you appeal to emotion, your argument will be subject to possible biases since the way a person or group feels towards something doesn't prove it right or wrong. <em>Incorrect</em>
Answer:
It is a word flies
Sorry that's all I can help.
