Hello there!
Question #1
<span>What was established in the case of Miranda v. Arizona?
One aspect that they truly convened was the fifth amendment which were to require laws that conveyed certain things that would have to be considered and handled properly.
Question #2
</span><span>How does this affect the legal process?
This would affect is because before this, it was quite easier to acquire certain laws, and to easily dishonor them. But ever sense this came about, it was more serious.
Question #3
</span><span> In the case of U.S. v. Nixon, what did the court ultimately decide about the president with regard to rule of law?
They decided that the president does not inform or enforce the final decision. It would have to go into a process,and not a pure law straight abound.
I hope this helps you!</span>
Answer:
True
Explanation:
It's correct on quizlet, i took the test
Answer:
This is entirely opinionated, but I'll remind you how much tension the Cold War brought. You can answer it either as a citizen or a world leader, I think.
Explanation:
The Cold War brought fear into practically everyone. Everyone was second guessing their friends, families, neighbors, even bosses to being Communist spies. The fear of someone, even in the government, being a spy wreaked havoc in society. Television began broadcasting commercials of what to do if your neighbor is a spy, there were advertisements in the paper, you couldn't go anywhere without being reminded of the Cold War. No Russian was trusted at this time. Not to mention there was the fear of a nuclear attack. There were fallout shelters made in people's homes, schools, and community gathering places. Cartoons were made for children to teach them what they should do if a nuclear warhead were to hit. It was basically Hell.
I believe theocratic is the answer. Hope this helped
