Answer:
The data are at the
<u>Nominal</u> level of measurement.
The given calculation is wrong because average (mean) cannot be calculated for nominal level of measurement.
Step-by-step explanation:
The objective here is to Identify the level of measurement of the data, and explain what is wrong with the given calculation.
a)
The data are at the <u> Nominal </u> level of measurement due to the fact that it portrays the qualitative levels of naming and representing different hierarchies from 100 basketball, 200 basketball, 300 football, 400 anything else
b) We are being informed that, the average (mean) is calculated for 597 respondents and the result is 256.1.
The given calculation is wrong because average (mean) cannot be calculated for nominal level of measurement. At nominal level this type of data set do not measure at all , it is not significant to compute their average (mean).
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Choice A will be true, that is, Emily would fine the sauce too garlicky.
Answer:
2
3
−
3
2
−
8
−
3
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
42
Step-by-step explanation:
6*8=48
3*2=6
48-6=42
I realise this is quite late but in case you still wanted the answer, the width is 3m.
If the length is 3m longer than the width, you can write the width as x and the length as x + 3. The perimeter would be both lengths and both widths added together, so you would just write it as:
x + x + x + 3 + x + 3 = 18
4x + 6 = 18
- 6
4x = 12
÷ 4
x = 3
I hope this helps!
