Answer:
A) Bush stirs up emotions of brotherhood and freedom to inspire Americans.
Explanation:
Bush had given several speeches during the 9/11 period, and the statements mainly focused on attacks by terrorist attacks that occurred at different times. Therefore, in his speech, he was trying to put the Americans together by explaining the importance of people coming together from all races during this challenging time.
In the last part of his speech, he discussed how the Americans would defend freedom if they moved forward together; the statement created hope and justifies the actions of the Americans.
The account on busing in Boston supports the inference is that D. The integration of schools was less problematic in the North than in the South.
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
It should be noted that an inference simply means the conclusion that can be deduced based on the information that given in a literary work.
In this case, the account on busing in Boston supports the inference is that the integration of schools was less problematic in the North than in the South.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
Answer:
B. Underground water close to the surface of the land
Explanation:
The water table is the underground dividing line between the unsaturated zone in the upper layer and the saturated zone in the lower layer. The unsaturated zone is the soil surface and zone of aeration where oxygen and water permeate through the soil. The saturated zone is composed of hard rock. When water precipitates from the soil, the result is the groundwater found below the water table.
Groundwater overflows as springs into water bodies at the point where the land surface converges with the water table. Therefore, regions with high table water will have their underground water close to the land surface.
Both sophists and philosophers were well trained and highly educated, but the main difference was that a sophist taught others and they got paid for that. It is said that their own wealth was their only goal.
Philosophers, such as Socrates, refused to get paid.
Throughout history, the sophists have had a reputation as professionally amoral, . They would help people to attain any goal, regardless of what it was. They would take any case, promote any cause, and empower any person, if the money was right.
Philosophers, for the most part, have walked on the side of the angels. They may sometimes have had reputations as prolix and obscure, complex and abstract, out of touch, but they have, for the most part, seemed to be purer souls in their focus and work.
In other words, the sophists were much more concerned about how than about why. The philosophers have always been more cautious.