1Journalistic writing may show bias.
2Journalism covers both the writing of facts and the expression of opinions.
3Journalism does not include news on the radio, on television, or on the Internet.
4Journalism is the writing and gathering of information.
i think between -1/2 or -2
but im very positive for -2
The question above wants to assess your ability to argue scientifically. As this skill is something very personal, I can't write this paragraph for you, but I will show you how to write one.
First of all, you should know that the Channels on Mars are evidence that there was once intelligent life on Mars, as these channels look like artificial channels created for the movement of water.
A scientific argument, in turn, refers to an opinion, based on proven scientific facts.
In this case, to write your argument you should:
- Search for articles featuring information and facts about the Channels on Mars.
- Read the articles, evaluate the information presented and create an opinion based on them.
- Write your opinion in a paragraph and show evidence, taken from the articles that prove this opinion.
Remember that despite being an opinion, a scientific argument is a formal text and must be written formally. Also, you must remember to use the words presented in the question above.
More information:
brainly.com/question/17444462?referrer=searchResults
If you're asking which comparison makes the least sense contextually with the others (or which one doesn't belong, in other words), the answer would be "When running, staying hydrated is more important than staying cool" because the other comparisons have to do with comparisons directly relating to the runners, such as comparing the speeds and ages, while this one, quite frankly, does not.
Answer will be A. Debtors
Explanation:
B. No because the government can fall because of not enough money.
C. No because Savers will run out of money.
