Which statement best explains how the u.s. constitution addressed a weakness of the articles of confederation?

2 answers:

6 0

The statement best explains how the Constitution addressed a weakness in the Articles of Confederation is : C) Congress had no way to enforce or interpret the laws it passed, so the Constitution created the executive and judicial branches of the federal government. to put it simply, when the constitution was first made, American people still had no basic experience for running a govenrment, so we made a couple of mistakes that eventually were revised

Charra [1.4K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The Articles of Confederation were the first constitutional foundation of the United States and the forerunner of the Constitution of 1787. Their regulations were essentially based on the principle of national sovereignty. After the Continental Congress passed them on November 15, 1777, they were in force from 1781 to 1789 after their three-year ratification.

The provisions of the Articles of Confederation were based on the principle of complete sovereignty of the individual states. In a way, they established an American confederation, which, however, had some structural deficiencies and quickly failed because of them.

From the outset of the Confederation, its legislature, the Continental Congress, was not allowed to levy its own taxes. Contributions from the member states should contribute to the functioning of the Confederation organs, however most member states did not comply with this convention. For this reason, the Confederation was unable to guarantee its members military protection against the increasing intervention of the European powers.

In addition, most of the member states did not feel obliged to accept agreements made in the Confederation. Since the latter lacked both enforcement and sanction options, the Confederation's scope for action was always limited. A key political-economic obstacle and expression of the fragmentation was, for example, the increasing delimitation of the member states by protective tariffs, which the Continental Congress was also powerless against, because they had the possibility, for example, of leaving the Confederation.

The Philadelphia Convention was convened to address these grievances. Actually, it should initially only advise on the possibility of improvements in the state organization and find a wording for the articles in order to reassure the individual states that feared for their power. In the end, however, it presented a completely new Constitution, which, unlike the Articles of Confederation, required a strong federal government as an executive body in the first place. This should take over the competences of the individual states, particularly in matters of foreign policy, foreign trade and national defense.

You might be interested in

What was the consensus among delegates to the constitutional convention about the articles of confederation?

NemiM [27]

<span>Most delegates had already concluded that there were weaknesses in the Artlicles</span>

7 0

3 years ago

During the French Revolution, radicals _____. A. wanted moderate reforms. B. wanted to maintain the French monarchy. C. wanted t

lbvjy [14]

C. wanted to establish a French Republic.

The radicals in France wanted to overthrow the monarchy and establish a republic form of government to mimic that of the United States.

Moderates believed a republic was too far of a leap for a country with the tradition of monarchy. They wanted to create a parliamentary system like Great Britain that would maintain a monarchy and have representation. Conservatives wanted to maintain the monarchy and as a result were often the target of the radical government. Robespierre and the Jacobins launched a government meant to be a republic which turned into a dictatorship filled with bloodshed at the blade of the guillotine.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which statement correctly describes British rule in India? Question 9 options: The British East India Company established tradin

Nastasia [14]

The British first assumed control of India by fighting a terrible war
The British East India Company only handled company business matters.

India was considered the most important colony of the British Empire and, therefore, the term British India was coined. The territory of India was under total control of the United Kingdom.

British India was a multicultural environment, formed by different races, languages and religions, especially the Indo-Europeans and the Mongolian race. In this period, the territory of India had more than 3 thousand languages and dialects and the religion of Brahmanism (Hinduism) was the most important.

England had a viceroy in Indian territory, who represented the highest authority in the colony and was responsible for accountability to the British Empire in London.

6 0

3 years ago

All of the following regulations were passed during the Progressive Moment to increase democracy except

Gnoma [55]

Initiatives and referendums were not passed during the Progressive Movement to increase democracy. = C)

7 0

3 years ago

What would be considered a secondary source about the assasination of Abraham Lincoln

Rainbow [258]

A secondary source could be someone that maybe discovered the body or is doing evaluations to see why or how he died, like a doctor for instance it would be a secondary source because............the doctor was not there and he did not watch so....and if he wrote about it then that would be a secondary source! :) <3 hope this helps!

3 0

3 years ago