Answer: death: well, she’s talking about death metaphorically as if it’s a person. It’s capitalized bc Death is a personification of death represented as a human-like concept.
Best: the capitalized Best is similar to the death. But it’s her intent to tie the concept of the superlative metaphorically to a person. However, the difference is, it’s an actual person not a personification of a concept
Explanation:
A sample argument that shows the most effective way to address those in power in order to accomplish a goal is:
in order to achieve equality across society, starting from schools, we should be able to have equal access, irrespective of age, or intellect.
If students who are younger are considered to be inferior and as such, cannot be engaged in the decision-making of their schools and society, there is a problem.
<h3>What is an Argumentative Essay?</h3>
This refers to the type of essay that is used to make arguments with the use of logic and rhetorical appeals to convince an audience about a particular topic.
Hence, we can see that a sample argument that is given above, based on the first prompt helps the readers to draw a conclusion and convince them that equal access and participation are important and necessary.
Read more about argumentative essays here:
brainly.com/question/22740197
#SPJ1
The setting is a house at midnight.
When Antony says D. I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him, that sentence anticipates the crowd's hostile reaction to Caesar.
Initially, they all loved Caesar, but over time, it turned out that his rule was weakening and that he was actually taking Rome down with him. This is something that Brutus didn't want to happen, so he had Caesar killed, even though he loved him as his best friend. These sentences are from Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar.
Correct answer choice is :
<h2>A) Shows how your solution has worked to solve similar problems</h2><h2 /><h2>Explanation:</h2><h2 />
The comparative approach is a procedure for examining the evolution of languages by doing a feature-by-feature comparison of two or more languages with common assault from a shared ancestor, in order to extrapolate back to infer the characteristics of that ancestor. The comparative approach may be compared with the method of internal reformation, in which the internal advancement of a single language is indicated by the study of features within that language.
