Expand - both sides wanted the valley so they could expand their settlements into the area
Mississippi - Great Britain secured territorial gains in French territory east of the Mississippi river
Canada - all the lands to the south of French Canada was claimed by England
South - the English gradually settled all along the Atlantic seaboard to the south of the Gulf of Saint Lawrence
In order to answer this question, I will use two different perspectives of ethics: the consequentialist perspective, and the deontological perspective.
Consequentialism argues that the morality of an action lies with its consequences. This means that an action with bad consequences is an immoral action, and vice versa. In this case, killing the last remaining Redwood would not have any negative consequence on any being in the world, as no one benefits from it anymore. This means that the act is not immoral.
A deontological perspective states that there are principles that should be taken as rules, and which govern what is right and what is wrong. Therefore, rules and duties are central. For example, a principle might state that "all life is valuable." As the Redwood falls under the definition of life, killing it would be considered an immoral action.
President John F. Kennedy eloquently evoked this principle in his 1963 address to the nation, following the court-order
Ruth is most likely experiencing agoraphobia
Answer:
no me brother u I am just asking for a few days ago do you have any questions or concerns please visit the tree of Life sciences and technology a Flipboard magazine by Flipboard your personal world off the tree
Explanation:
because I only what the points
