To address the promise previously started during his initial inaugural address
Answer:
A: Slaves
Explanation:
Slaves were first of all, already poor and not paid at all. So this answer is most likely.
Answer:
A. It would provide economic access to countries in East Asia.
Explanation:
What I found on the web, "The senator was an advocate of American imperialism. Among other goals, he supported the annexation of the Phillippines. He believed this to be justified because of the "white man's burden": the idea that Western, white people had the moral duty to educate other less civilized people."
I hope this helps, I always appreciate Brainliest!!! :)
He spoke out against the soviet union's refusal to allow Jews to immigrate to Israel.
The question is based on your own opinion,I cannot give you direct answer,but here's some idea for you.
yes: the war was caused by extreme nationalism,where the nations had the desire to be strong with and they seek for national glory. It started with this concept,they began to ally,to expand,soon running into conflicts,eventually the scale enlarged to a world war. Yet the chase for national glory was originally to bring a better nation,in the end it just cause loss and destruction. War is not necessary to be started in orfer to gain national glory. Were the nations to back down,it could be avoided. You might want to expand more on the destruction it caused if you choose yes.
No: In spite of WWI did cause a lot of destruction,it pushes the history of human foward. You could talk more on the things achieved and changed in WWI,such as the fall of empires,the uprise of women rights,the establishment of national cooperation system(League of nations), and the develope of more destructive weapons.
hope it helps!
