Answer:
A lifestyle that can improve your quality of life is definitely C. Managing stress effectively
Explanation:
When it comes to lifestyle practices that can improve your quality of life, it is important to bear in mind that healthy practices are in urgent need. Eating healthy is highly recommended, a diet high in cholesterol is a bad choice because of your heart’s and many other consequences. Going to parties everyday just will make feel exhausted and living alone is a way of isolation, it is better to share some of your time with family and friends. So managing stress it is TOO important in having a healthy lifestyle.
The reason is because <span>Governors ofter have more patronage positions at their disposal.
Since governement could heavily influence the policies within local level, many local businesses are more attracted to give financial aid to a certain government representative rather than having to rely to the presidents that based their decision for the sake of all states outside their operation ares.</span>
Answer:
Southern colonies (agriculture), and New England Colonies
Explanation:
The Southern Colonies relied on plantations and cash crops in order to attain revenue, while the New England colonies relied more on fishing and lumber since the ground was less arable.
Economic Forces As a political conservative, he believes this improvement is primarily due to economic forces. Development in urban life is a result of economic factors or economic development.
More about development and economic forces:
It is generally agreed that economic development and growth are influenced by four factors: human resources, physical capital, natural resources and technology. Economic factors play a critical role in a country's economic development. In most cases, the stock of capital and the rate of capital accumulation determine whether a country will grow or not at a young age. There are a few other economic factors that have an impact on development, but their significance pales in comparison to capital formation.
Learn more about economic development here:
brainly.com/question/14938585
#SPJ4
Answer:
You should think about fair competition.
Explanation:
The ethics question here would be: Is the contribution I'm willing to pay to get the contract a bribery? So, if there are better firms than mine but they don't have the money to pay the contribution, does it mean I get preferential treatment because I can afford it? Wouldn't it be considered unfair by many?
This a common practice in business and although seen morally wrong by many, it is the only way to ensure some contracts are signed. People who advocate this way of dealing with allocating contracts say that it is a fair way, everybody has the opportunity in life to make money and some people would always make more than others. Critics say that it's unfair, especially for smaller firms and developing companies, as their chances to win big contracts are being reduced drastically.
