Answer:
D) Myanmar and Thailand
Explanation:
Myanmar and Thailand dont belong to the indian subcontinent :)
The answer cannot be a because appointing all federal judges would lead to a very "one-sided" jurisdiction and promotes bias. It cannot be b either because the supreme court on average only accepts 80 cases a year though it receives thousands of requests. C is also incorrect because the supreme court does not practice "judicial restraint" it is actually known as "judicial review". The difference? The supreme court can only uphold and postpone a victim or<span> </span>defendants ruling until the court has come to the final decision. Therefor judicial restraint only represents a miniscule version of judicial review. So the answer is inevitably d.It determines whether any actions by the executive and legislative branches are unconstitutional. Hope this helps :)
Answer:
He wanted to win the Liberals.
Explanation:
Mackenzie King having been elected by the minority in 1921 called the election so can win more of the liberals at his time. He never got that since the conservatives won 116 seats ahead of liberals with 101 seats. He remained in power despite his loss and retained his presence from progressives with 24 seats. The liberals were involved in scandals that resulted in availing for the statue of Westminster in 1931 and making room for Canada's independence and making the role of Governor-General a figure-head and representative of the government and political will and power resting on the Prime Minister.