Answer:
Postmodern ideologues declare that at the beginning of the 20th century the classical style of modern thinking is changing
The best answer would be "Using the atomic bomb would change the world forever by making it a more dangerous place."
The greatest difference between the 14 points and the ToV is the blame for the war. In the ToV Germany is blamed for the war and the Treaty is more a sentence than terms of an armistice, to where the 14 points was more a negotiated settlement for an armistice. The 14 points may have included and recognized the new German and would have brought that government into the negotiation process. Many aspects would have been difficult for Germany to agree to but instead of the agreement being forced upon them the new German government would have played a role in the resolution. It was the Germans that first accepted the 14 points for an armistice, knew the terms, and exiled there emperor I believe that there would have been strong support to honor the agreement by the German people. The ToV on the other hand was made to punish the Germans, Breakup the German Empire, and have the Germans pay for the war. It was also made to negate the role played by Wilson and the USA in the war. The ToV also allowed the Allied powers to keep their colonies and only the German colonies were, in some point in time, to be open for autonomous rule. The 14 points might have prevented WW2, the ToV was the punishment that bound the German people together to avenge the disgrace.
I hope I helped!
The people of the Indus Valley. Some of them were farmers. They grew crops like barley, peas, wheat, dates, and melons. The farms were not just for , some grew cotton and raised sheep, pigs, and cattle. Every town had its own storage building to hold what that town needed.
