This question is incomplete, here´s the complete question.
For those who may think I exaggerate the contrast between the former river canyon and the present man-made impoundment, I suggest a trip on Lake Powell followed immediately by another boat trip on the river below the dam. Take a boat from Lee's Ferry up the river to within sight of the dam, then shut off the motor and allow yourself the rare delight of a quiet, effortless drifting down the stream. ln that twelve-mile stretch of living green, singing birds, flowing water and untarnished canyon walls — sights and sounds a million years older and infinitely lovelier than the roar of motorboats — you will rediscover a small and imperfect sampling of the kind of experience that was taken away from everybody when the oligarch and politicians condemned our river for purposes of their own.
Which rhetorical technique is Abbey using in the underlined section of this excerpt?
A. Pathos
B. Ethos
C. Logos
D. Ad hominem
Answer: A. Pathos
Explanation:
Pathos is a rhetorical technique that appeals to an audience's emotions. To persuade them, an argument that creates an emotional reaction is made. Especially used in literature to spark specific feelings from readers. In this case, Abbey applies it by describing the "living green, singing birds" and how lovely the "sights and sounds" of the river are in order to make her point.
Question 1: The idea of racism must be changed.
Question 2: It is necessary for this change to occur so that a nation that has dreams, hopes, and preaches freedom can actually be free, and it won't be a free nation until all of the citizens are released.
Question 3: By changing this idea, Americans would start seeing each other as Americans and have what they claim to have. By not viewing a race of people differently than everyone else, then America would be true to what it says.
direct objects and indirect objects in the sentence are -
her opinion - D.O.
the class - I.O.
<h3>What receives the indirect object?</h3>
direct objects receiving the from the indirect objects
You could discover that you require an indirect object once you have a statement with a direct object. Indirect objects frequently follow prepositions such to or for and take the place of the direct objects by responding to the queries "To whom (or what)?" and "For whom (or what)?" For instance:
Mother provides us with food. (Who provided the food?)
My buddy wrote me a letter.(Who got the letter?)
To learn more about direct and indirect objects from given link
brainly.com/question/1427574
#SPJ4
The appropriate punctuation will be:
I bought a new carpet, and paid for fitting two weeks ago. On the day the workmen were supposed to fit the carpet, though there was no sign of them. Where were they? If they couldn’t make it, why didn’t they call and let me know. I spent the whole day inside the house and completely wasted a lovely sunny day. I’m not happy.
<h3>What is punctuation?</h3>
It should be noted that punctuation simply means the use of symbols to divide written words into clauses and sentences.
In this case, the appropriate punctuation is illustrated above.
Learn more about punctuations on:
brainly.com/question/1224394
#SPJ1
