Answer:
Sparta
-had a powerful army
-led the Peloponnesian League
-focused on military strength
Athens
-had a powerful navy
-led the Delian League
-introduced the concept of
democracy in government
Explanation:
Peloponnesian League, also called Spartan Alliance was a military coalition of Greek city-states led by Sparta, formed in the 6th century bc.
Sparta was leader of an alliance of independent states that included most of the major land powers of the Peloponnese and central Greece, as well as the sea power Corinth. Thus, the Athenians had the stronger navy and the Spartans the stronger army.
Answer:
Constitutional Provisions
Constitution of the United States, Article I, Section 8: Gives Congress the power to declare war and raise and support the armed forces.
Answer:
B. Defeating the Nationalists in a violent civil war.
Explanation:
The Chinese Civil War was a war fought between the Kuomintang government of the Republic of China and the Communist Party of China. The final phase of this was known as the Chinese Communist Revolution, and it resulted in the rise to power of the Communist Party of China. After the war, the Nationalist government (Kuomintang) retreated to the island of Taiwan, with both parties claiming to be the "legitimate" government of all of China.
A huge part of it had to deal with the way that the French government dealt with debt.
<span>Only their third estate, primarily poor merchants and peasants, paid any taxes. The French largely funded the American Revolution because of their long-standing animosity with Great Britain. However, the debt they incurred was only slowly paid off because the people they were taxing had very little money. The country fell into an economic crisis and resentment began to build against the first and second estates--the weathly, title-holder, landed gentry and clergy. Thus the revolution. </span>
<span>A good comparison is Great Britain post-America Revolution, who taxed their citizens more fairly and avoided revolution by not throwing most of their citizens into the desperate straits of poverty.</span>
Answer: E) separation of powers
Explanation:
The Line-item veto is a provision that allows an Executive authority such as a Governor or the President to cancel out parts of a bill enacted by Congress without having to veto the whole thing. Essentially it is a partial veto power that allows them to veto a bill only in part should they please.
Governors in 45 US States have this right but the President of the United States does not.
It is argued that this provision violates the principle of Separation of Powers amongst the Judiciary, the Legislature and the Executive.
This is because the Legislature should have exclusive power to construct the inner texts of a bill and the Executive should not be able to alter this content.
