The argument in favor of US economic aid to other nations is invalid because the premises do not relate to the conclusion.
An argument is valid when all the premises are true and build a true conclusion.
According to the above, the argument presented has the following premises:
- Foreign economic aid to other countries is a good investment for the United States.
- It comprises only one percent of the entire federal budget, about $ 20 billion.
And the conclusion it presents is:
- Returns untold amounts in increased sales of American goods and services.
According to the above, the argument is a fallacy because the premises are not related to the conclusion because:
An investment is an economic contribution to receive a later profit, in this case, the United States is investing, and those who are receiving the profit are private US companies. Furthermore, no argument is presented that relates the increase in sales of goods and services with this investment.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/2645376
Answer:
Explanation
Explanation:
The people were forced still but sometime they had a way easier time to escape if they tried. Also the force on slaves was different because they mostly were all the same race.
Answer:
Schools that focused on Agriculture
Explanation:
The Morrill Land Grant Act of 1862 allowed for the various States to receive funding to establish schools with a focus on agriculture.
This allowed for an American agricultural revolution.
The battle of midway what the turning point of the pacific war
