That’s a lot of words. I wish I had the answer as well. Brainly you suck
Perhaps you should read the book rich dad poor dad
Answer:
A). Nativist; Empiricist.
Explanation:
A nativist view proposes the claim that the 'perceptual development' of humans is highly inflated by the nature. Such <u>a view asserts that humans are born with certain intrinsic ability or skill to develop or learn a language/speech.</u> While the 'empiricist' perspective promotes the idea that human beings and their perceptual developments are more influenced by the external/environmental factors which include a major contribution of <u>'learning and experiences'</u>. Therefore, the former one encourages the role of 'nature' while the latter promotes the part played by 'nurture' in shaping an individual's 'intuitive/perceptual' development.
Answer:
See below:
Explanation:
Separate but equal is a contradictory idea. Why must equal things be separate in the first place? Firstly, as many know, America's history with the concept has been deceptive. For example, the "colored" restrooms were poorly looked after, while the "white" bathrooms were typically well taken care of, more so than the other bathrooms anyway. The idea was that because different races cannot coexist, we should be separated but given equal resources to survive. The only reason one would legally separate races is because they believed one race to be superior in value to the others. Therefore, separate but equal is nothing but a baseless, political pacifier.
Stay cool.<3