I believe the answer is: <span>There are numerous and variable interpretations of events and their significance.
In examining history, we have to see each events from the perspective of all the individuals and groups that are involved in the story.
If we only make an interpretation based on one individual;s or one group's point of view, the information would most likely catered in a way that make them appear to have positive attitude/characteristics.</span>
Answer:
Congress has to create the law.
Explanation:
Congress can create a law, but the president has to sign it in order for it to become a law.
D. He looked to the Classical past for truth
While Rousseau did study the past in his pursuit of truth, he looked at man in his natural state (i.e pre-civilization). Rousseau's Discourse on Inequality is his foray into the evolution of man from his natural state into what the man of Rousseau's time. Rousseau described uncivilized man as a "noble savage". Critics argue that Rousseau was idealizing man in an uncivilized state and advocating for a return to this. What he likely meant was that man is naturally moral (driven by the well- balanced instincts of piety and survival) and that it is society that corrupts man. Classical philosophy and art is part of the society that Rousseau criticizes. In his Discourse on the Arts and Sciences he provides the link between the fall of the Roman empire and the peak of the Roman arts as an example of the detrimental effect arts (and that which was celebrated during the classical Greek and Roman periods as the best kind of human activity) has on man's natural sense of decency and morality.
Answer:
1
The action of Pfizer is no way near an ethical act and was a clear violation of the ethical standards.This is true because
- As it is the company responsibility to act ethically to achieve the goals of the society by eradicating their problems and not by enhancing them hence the corporate social responsibility would not allow the company to behave inhumanly
- The duty based ethics would also empower the corporation to care and respect humanity
- Its is highly unethical on the part of Pfizer to conduct test on human life.if we consider the six basic guidelines to make ethical decisions then they have done it in a highly unethical manner.The six basic guidelines would never allow any company to behave i such a manner so as to risk the human life
Pfizer did not obey any of the above ethical standards and the conduct was clear violation of ethical standard.
2
Pfizer plc is not guilty of any ethical standard violation as it is a common practice for drug manufacturer to conduct tests on animals as well as human.And anyways the company conducted the tests on those human beings who will die with the epidermic which has already invaded the entire country of Nigeria.Hence in other to save/protect a large number of human being the test on the few persons is ethical as it is done to protect the society at large
So we cannot say that the company had violated any ethical standard
3
In order for Pfizer to avert the consequences of the violation then Pfizer should use the following five steps to create solution tom problem on ethical question these steps include
- Inquiry : It is very crucial to make initial inquiry about the entire subject matter
- Discussion: If there is a list of action generated after inquiry then discussion on every single action should be made
- Decision : It is highly crucial to take any decision with the consensus of all the participating candidates
- Justification : Each decision made must have a justification for the entire process
- Evaluation : it is highly crucial to evaluate the entire process
Explanation:
