1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VARVARA [1.3K]
3 years ago
5

Who was pro-war and anti-war in the war of 1812?

History
2 answers:
kramer3 years ago
5 0

first america was not intrested in the war but later had their hand forced cause on allie need tem

Mkey [24]3 years ago
4 0

the war hawks in congress were pro war. They were pushing for war (south) while the people in the north weren't because they relied on GB for trade

You might be interested in
Anybody help? please
Mazyrski [523]

Answer:

ok what is the question plz

7 0
2 years ago
Clothing artifacts can indicate the __________ in which people lived.
KatRina [158]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the cost of victory in the seven years war for Britain
qwelly [4]

Answer:

Even though Great Britian defeated France and its allies, the victory came at great cost. In January 1763, Great Britain's national debt was more than 122 million pounds [the British monetary unit], an enormous sum for the time. Interest on the debt was more than 4.4 million pounds a year.

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was a factor in the united states dominating the world economy after world war ii?
Pachacha [2.7K]
The other major manufacturers of the world stopped trading
7 0
3 years ago
What was a MAIN reason why the Eastern Roman Empire lasted so much longer than the Western Roman Empire?
zhenek [66]

Answer:

"Fall of Rome" redirects here. For other uses, see Fall of Rome (disambiguation).

"The Fall of the Roman Empire" redirects here. For the film, see The Fall of the Roman Empire (film).

The fall of the Western Roman Empire (also called the fall of the Roman Empire or the fall of Rome) was the process of decline in the Western Roman Empire in which the Empire failed to enforce its rule, and its vast territory was divided into several successor polities. The Roman Empire lost the strengths that had allowed it to exercise effective control over its Western provinces; modern historians posit factors including the effectiveness and numbers of the army, the health and numbers of the Roman population, the strength of the economy, the competence of the Emperors, the internal struggles for power, the religious changes of the period, and the efficiency of the civil administration. Increasing pressure from invading barbarians outside Roman culture also contributed greatly to the collapse. The reasons for the collapse are major subjects of the historiography of the ancient world and they inform much modern discourse on state failure.[1][2][3]

376, unmanageable numbers of Goths and other non-Roman people, fleeing from the Huns, entered the Empire. In 395, after winning two destructive civil wars, Theodosius I died, leaving a collapsing field army and the Empire, still plagued by Goths, divided between the warring ministers of his two incapable sons. Further barbarian groups crossed the Rhine and other frontiers and, like the Goths, were not exterminated, expelled or subjugated. The armed forces of the Western Empire became few and ineffective, and despite brief recoveries under able leaders, central rule was never effectively consolidated.

By 476, the position of Western Roman Emperor wielded negligible military, political, or financial power, and had no effective control over the scattered Western domains that could still be described as Roman. Barbarian kingdoms had established their own power in much of the area of the Western Empire. In 476, Odoacer deposed the last emperor in Italy, and the Western Senate sent the imperial insignia to the Eastern Emperor.

While its legitimacy lasted for centuries longer and its cultural influence remains today, the Western Empire never had the strength to rise again. It never again controlled any portion of Western Europe to the North of the Alps. The Eastern Roman, or Byzantine Empire survived, and though lessened in strength remained for centuries an effective power of the Eastern Mediterranean.

While the loss of political unity and military control is universally acknowledged, the Fall is not the only unifying concept for these events; the period described as Late Antiquity emphasizes the cultural continuities throughout and beyond the political collapse.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The __________ (New England, Middle, Southern) colonies had the most diversity both ethnically and religiously.
    6·1 answer
  • Use the chart below to explain the ancient familial hierarchy? List the rights of each level
    14·1 answer
  • The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide the issue of slavery by popular sovereignty. Th
    14·1 answer
  • What was true about both credit and layaway plans?
    10·1 answer
  • What differences separted the Soviet Union from the United States in years following World War 2
    8·1 answer
  • Three branches of government were created by the framers of the
    6·1 answer
  • Which event marked the beginning of the modern airline industry?​ a. ​The Wrights' first flight at Kitty Hawk in 1903 b. ​The UP
    8·2 answers
  • To what extent did the role of the federal government change under President Theodore Roosevelt in regard to TWO of the followin
    9·1 answer
  • What was the NAACAP objective??<br>​
    14·1 answer
  • Why did Spain establish a territorial empire in the New World?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!