Southern states had never left the Union, so the executive branch had authority over Reconstruction.
They commonly have been led with the aid of using the White yeomanry and that they dominated Southern politics in maximum regions from the 1870s to 1910. in some unspecified time in the future at some point of Reconstruction, the South was underneath career by way of manner of federal forces, and Southern state governments were dominated via Republicans, elected in huge component by using freedmen and allies.
Lincoln's plan for Reconstruction has become referred to as the 10 percent Plan, which he was hoping might be straightforward and doable for Southern states. The plan required that former Confederates take an oath pledging allegiance to the Union and accepting the quitting of slavery.
The number one distinction between Lincoln's plans for reconstruction and Johnson's became regard to the rights of freedmen following the realization of the Civil conflict. Even as Lincoln wanted to ensure rights, together with vote casting, for the formerly enslaved, Johnson's plan did now not have these equal necessities.
Learn more about governments here: brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ4
British people were not a target of racism during World war 2
Answer:
The Aleuts
Explanation:
<h2>Follow instagrm at ➜ mvnnyvibes</h2><h2>Follow instagrm at ➜ mvnnyvibes</h2>
A. the Compromise of 1850 was illegal because it was illegal for Congress to deprive a slave owner of property (slaves) without the due process of law.
Under the Compromise of 1850, western states were allowed to vote whether or not territories would allow slavery. The compromise also created a dividing line for existing states between free and slave states.
The Dred Scott case was decided in 1857 after Scott's master had moved him into free states. He argued that by being moved into free states, declared after the Compromise of 1850, changed his status. The Court declared slaves were not people but were property. Due to their status as property, the property could not be taken away just because the master moved.
The New England colonies in the New World grew more rapidly than New France and New Netherlands. Reasons are:
- Religious freedom. The colonies were opened up to all religions.
- Opportunities to make a living. Wealthy Englishmen thought that they could grow even richer in colonies.
- Democratic government and avoiding of tyranny. On the other hand, the Dutch colony of New Netherlands was harshly and undemocratically governed.
