Answer:
A. Conflict theory
Explanation:
Conflict theory: In sociology, the term conflict theory was proposed by Karl Marx, who believed that the society is considered to be in a state of perpetual conflict due to the competition related to limited resources.
According to conflict theory, social order is being maintained by power and domination instead of conformity and consensus.
The conflict theory represents social life as a competition and aims at the distribution of power, inequality, and resources.
In the question above, the statement signifies the use of the conflict theory.
Answer:
jellyfish
Explanation:
such skeletons may be internal,as in vertebrates,or external,as arthropods. They do very well without hard parts
<u>Answer</u>: The <u>Legalists </u>philosophers believed that every aspect of life should be governed by strict and impersonal laws.
The Legalism is the third intellectual current that flourished in China before the unification by the Qin Dynasty. The three centuries before the unification were so rich in terms of political thought that is known as “The Golden Age of Chinese Philosophy” with “The Hundred Schools” of thoughts. Other famous schools in this period are Confucianism and Taoism.
The long period of war were times of great chaos and disorder. Profound changes happened during these three centuries – economical, military and social changes. A new administrative approach needed to arise and the Legalists were at the forefront of this innovation.
Legalism is the most practical current of that period. Legalists would not focus on philosophical speculations, such as the evolution of the human nature, morality or divine will. Instead, they focus on how to achieve the goal of unification. Nothing, not even the past, could distract them of this goal. Because of that, they defended that the past doesn’t teach a thing and doesn’t shape the present or the future, but a radical change in the present is the only way to restructure the society. This change could only happen by “the rule of the law”, where individual morality of the ruled and the rulers are not taken into consideration. They believed that every aspect of life should be governed by strict and impersonal laws. Applying those is the radical change that would create a powerful government, able to coerce its subjects and install a rich state and a powerful army. In that scenario, the state has the ultimate authority and such power is given to it by means of military strength.
I think your question if if they can "co-exist", correct?
They can and they have coexisted many times in the past, and even today. A monarchy with teocracy happens when there is a ruler (monarch ) who has an absolute or near-absolute power and claims to derive this power from God.
A historical example is ancient Egypt and a current example is Vatican City
