1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Softa [21]
3 years ago
13

If the company in california had trademark protection on the name wizard, could there still be a violation even if there was no

confusion about which company was which
Business
1 answer:
Mashutka [201]3 years ago
5 0
Yes, there could still possibly be a trademark violation on the name wizard, even if there is no confusion about which company it was when going to site. This is because the company in California had the name first and most likely had trademarked the name for their business. 
You might be interested in
Jamar used to work as an office manager, earning $40,000 per year. He gave up that job to start a life-coaching business. In cal
Eva8 [605]

Answer:

B) opportunity costs.

Explanation:

The $40,000 salary that Jamar gave up are part of his opportunity costs.

Opportunity costs are the costs (or benefits lost) from choosing one activity or investment over another alternative.

When you calculate the economic profit of a new project you must include all the implicit or opportunity costs that you incur or lose due to the new project:

economic profit = accounting profit - implicit costs

7 0
3 years ago
For a recent year, Wicker Company-owned restaurants had the following sales and expenses (in millions):Sales $38,800Food and pac
Julli [10]

Answer:

a. The Company's contribution margin is $10,476 millions

b. The Company's contribution margin ratio is 27%

c. The Income from operations will increase $621 millions

Explanation:

In order to calculate Wicker Company's contribution margin we have to use the following formula:

contribution margin=Sales- Variable costs

Sales=$38,800 millions

Variable costs=Food and packaging+Payroll+40%General, selling, and administrative expenses

Hence, Variable costs=$16,284+$9,800+40%($5,600)=$28,324 millions

a. Therefore, contribution margin=$38,800-$28,324=$10,476 millions

In order to calculate the contribution margin ratio we would have to use the following formula:

contribution margin ratio=<u>contribution margin</u> × 100

                                                    Sales

contribution margin ratio=<u>$10,476 </u> × 100

                                           $38,800 millions

b. contribution margin ratio=27%

In order to calculate how much would income from operations increase if same-store sales increased by $2,300 million for the coming year, with no change in the contribution margin ratio or fixed costs, we have to make the followinf calculation:

$2,300 million×0.27=$621 millions

c. Income from operations will increase $621 millions

5 0
4 years ago
For a typical firm, which of the following sequences is CORRECT? All rates are after taxes, and assume that the firm operates at
GREYUIT [131]

Answer:

The answer is: re > rs > WACC > rd.

Explanation:

We can see that the return on equity is greater than return on common stock which is greater than Weighted average cost of capital and return on debt.

For the source of financing, debt will be less cost than others because of the tax effect.

While weighted average cost is decided by return on equity, preferred stock and debt. => It is higher than the cost for debt.

4 0
4 years ago
Suppose the transfers of pillars to the Lantern Division cut into sales to outside customers by 14,000 units. Further suppose th
Sloan [31]

Complete question:

The Pillar Division of the Gothic Building Company produces basic pillars which can be sold to outside customers or sold to the Lantern Division of the Gothic Company. Last year, the Lantern Division bought all of its 25,000 pillars from Pillar at $2.00 each. The following data are available for last year's activities of the Pillar Division:

Capacity in units                                             320,000 pillars

Selling price per pillar to outside customers        $2.05

Variable costs per pillar                                         $1.20

Fixed costs, total                                                     $155,000

The total fixed costs would be the same for all the alternatives considered below.

Suppose the transfers of pillars to the Lantern Division cut into sales to outside customers by 20,000 units. Further suppose that an outside supplier is willing to provide the Lantern Division with basic pillars at $1.92 each. If the Lantern Division had chosen to buy all of its pillars from the outside supplier instead of the Pillar Division, the change in net operating income for the company as a whole would have been:

$2,000 decrease.

$14,000 increase.

$1,000 decrease.

$18,000 decrease.

I tried my best to find the question but was unable to find the exact question, instead I found a symmetry question and its solution is as under:

Answer:

Option D. $18,000 decrease

Explanation:

The decrease in the net operating income that would occur due to purchase of all of the pillars from the outside supplier would cost the additional cost to the company which is opportunity cost per pillar and is calculated by using the following formula:

Opportunity Cost = Variable Cost - Purchasing Cost

Here, the variable cost to manufacture the pillar within the factory is $1.2 per pillar whereas the purchasing cost of pillars from outside supplier is $1.92 per pillar.

By putting values, we have:

Opportunity Cost = $1.2 - $1.92  = $0.72

Now for purchasing 25,000 units from the supplier, the total opportunity cost would be:

Total Opportunity Cost = $0.72 * 25,000 Units Purchased from Outside Supplier =         -  $18,000

The minus sign shows the decrease in the net operating income.

6 0
3 years ago
urphy Inc., which produces a single product, has provided the following data for its most recent month of operation:Number of un
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

Results are below.

Explanation:

The absorption costing method includes all costs related to production, both fixed and variable. <u>The unit product cost is calculated using direct material, direct labor, and total unitary manufacturing overhead. </u>

The v<u>ariable costing method incorporates all variable production costs (direct material, direct labor, and variable overhead).</u>

<u>Unit cost under absorption costing:</u>

Unitary product cost= 137 + 75 + 4 + (846,800/14,600)

Unitary product cost= $274

<u>Unit cost under variable costing:</u>

Unitary variable product cost= 137 + 75 + 4

Unitary variable product cost= $216

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A portfolio has 40% of its value in IBM shares and the rest in Microsoft (MSFT). The volatility of IBM and MSFT are 35% and 30%,
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of a functional skill?
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a business plan most similar to?
    8·1 answer
  • When a firm is coordinating the flow of all goods, services and information among channel members, and throughout the channel, i
    12·1 answer
  • Kent Manufacturing produces a product that sells for $50.00 and has variable costs of $24.00 per unit. Fixed costs are $260,000.
    13·1 answer
  • This information relates to Rice Co..
    12·1 answer
  • Sdfghjgfdsdfghyuytrewqaswerty
    14·2 answers
  • Between 1790 and 1830, the population of New York increased nearly five times over. This population increase was
    9·1 answer
  • The prepaid insurance account had a balance of $3,000 at the beginning of the year. The account was debited for $32,500 for prem
    15·1 answer
  • Y AM I SO SAD RN I NEED TO TALK TO SOMEONE ???!!!!!
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!