Answers to #1:
Raphael Lemkin's definition of genocide was not accepted until after the Holocaust.
Raphael Lemkin had been studying the problem of mass killings of a people group since the 1920s, in regard to Turkish slaughter of Armenians in 1915. He coined the term "genocide" in 1944, in reference then also to the Holocaust. The term uses Greek language roots and means "killing of a race" of people. Lemkin served as an advisor to Justice Robert Jackson, the lead prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials. "Crimes against humanity" was the charge used at the Nuremberg trials, since no international legal definition of "genocide" had yet been accepted. Ultimately, Lemkin was able to persuade the United Nations to accept the definition of genocide and codify it into international law. In December, 1948, the United Nations adopted the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, which made use of a number of Lemkin's ideas on the subject.
#2: For item #2, you didn't ask a question, so I won't attempt to guess at what question you might have in mind. The definition as you quote it comes from Article II of the UN's Genocide Convention. Article III also indicts intention and conspiracy to commit genocide as crimes against international law. Article IV of that same Convention then puts teeth into the UN's action, saying, "Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals."
Answer:
Right answer:
C. 4.6 billion years old.
Explanation:
So that everyone knew there were Jewish I think
Some reasons to feel optimistic about the war against Islamic State are:
- It will help eradicate terrorism.
- It will act as a reset button as most terrorists in the area will be killed.
- Eradicating ISIS will set an example to the whole world that is creating menace in the world will lead them to their death.
<h3>What are positives about the war against ISIS?</h3>
The war against ISIS would be an opportunity to defeat them and eradicate the type of terrorism that they espouse which is violent and uncompromising.
It will also act as a reset button on terrorism in the area that ISIS occupied as the terrorists would be killed which means new terrorists would have to start from scratch.
Also, getting rid of ISIS sends a message to the whole world that any group that causes a menace like ISIS did can be certain of death and annihilation.
Options include:
- It will help eradicate terrorism.
- It will act as a reset button as most terrorists in the area will be killed.
- Eradicating ISIS will set an example to the whole world that is creating menace in the world will lead them to their death.
In conclusion, all options are correct.
Find out more on the war against ISIS at brainly.com/question/17065640
#SPJ1
Hello!
The most accurate answer is
William Henry Harrison
Glad to help :)
