Answer: As a male, I would not have been motivated to leave England for this environment because I would have thought of the possibility of fatal outcomes that would cause loss of life to me and my family over any opportunities of financial gains available in the colonies.
Explanation: The availability of any opportunities in the Chesapeake colonies would not have motivated me anymore once I had got to know about the fatal conditions there. The reason I would have chosen to stay back in England and take care of myself and my family would be the vulnerability to death prevalent in the Chesapeake colonies.
Answer:
Explanation:
Determinant 1: There is a new fertilizer that reduces the unhealthy crops. This will increase the total units of corn and so the supply will increase and shift to the right.
Determinant 2: There is an unexpected long winter season that unable farmers to harvest. There will be a decrease in the total units of corn , the supply for corn will reduce and will shift to the left.
Determinant 3: Government announces a tax benefit per unit of corn produced. This will lead to an increase in corn production, the supply will increase and shift to the right.
The correct answer is B.
<u>Therefore the appropiate null and alternative hypothesis are the following:</u>
. H 0 : p 1 = p 2
H 1 : p 1 ≠ p 2
The aim of the test would be to conclude whether H0 should be rejected or not at a 10% significance level.
<u>In this case a billateral significance test needs to be conducted,</u> as such a test consists on testing the equality of the test value with a given value. In this case the H0 would be rejected if the test value is significanly different, both in the case that it is superior or inferior.
On the contrary, an unilateral significance test would have been conducted if aiming to check whether a value is superior or equal to the test value (left unilateral) or inferior or equal to this value (right unilateral).
Then, the result of the test is the one stated: rejecting H0 at the 10% significance level.
I believe the answer is: Spin doctor
Spin doctor refers to the person that responsible in creating a biased interpretation on the press in order to shine the current cabinet on a positive light. It is very common for people in this occupation to create controversy or false narrative in order to gain favorable opinion form the voters.
Answer:
Explanation:
The people who called it the golden door, usually hadn't experienced the harsh reality of the island. They were usually people who wanted to go to America, but could not afford it, or didn't have the right circumstances. The people that called it the isle of tears had either been there or heard the stories of what it was really like. Ellis Island was full of sadness, hunger, and fear. I think the isle of tears is a better description because the immigrants on the island did cry, in fact, they cried often. The golden door to America is not a realistic version of the island. The island was a door to America, but not a golden one. Therefore the isle of tears is a more fitting name.
