1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vlada [557]
3 years ago
15

To attach or add to something larger is

History
2 answers:
andrey2020 [161]3 years ago
5 0
Is to join. When you add or attach to something to another or more than another, it means that you are joining them together. So, from the info you gave me, I would say join/joining is the best option.

I hope this helps!
Abbey
rewona [7]3 years ago
3 0
To join something .......
You might be interested in
Write a one-paragraph letter to the editor of a newspaper from the perspective of a Federalist supporting ratification of the Co
V125BC [204]

Answer:

Explanation:

Dear Sir,

As a Federalist, I support the ratification of the United States Constitution because the country should have a strong government. This is crucial to the existence of our country as it will prevent the problem the country was having under the Articles of Confederation. Also, the strong government will not lead to tranny because the Constitution will have a bill of rights.

Thanks.

Yours faithfully,

7 0
3 years ago
How did expansionism change the United States role in the world
nikdorinn [45]
It played a big role in the united states so that would be the correct answer and yes you do it all good morning you don’t want me anything else i was the
6 0
4 years ago
Which amendment resulted in U.S. senators being elected directly by the voting public? A.the 19th Amendment B.the 18th Amendment
Serhud [2]
The 17th Amendment (C) established the system of direct elections of Senators by the voting public. This changed the system whereby these individuals were previously elected by state legislatures. 
8 0
3 years ago
One result of the Gauls invading Rome was the building of the Hadrian's Wall.
vodka [1.7K]
The answer is a)True
7 0
3 years ago
Was the Treaty of Versailles a reasonable punishment for Germany? (explain your reasoning with multiple sentences)
tamaranim1 [39]

Answer:

The Treaty of Versailles was not a reasonable punishment for Germany because they were not the ones who started the war and they were not the only ones who fought for the Axis/Central Powers.

Explanation:

The amount of money the Germans had to pay should have been split between the other countries who fought with Germany and Austria-Hungary should have gotten this blame/Punishment but they didn´t because Germany was more powerful and stronger than the other Countries that were on the same side. It also stripped Germany´s 13% of its land, along with the population. Germany was forced to pay 269 billion while their Military was also stripped down in numbers.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did new englander thomas pickering and many other living in the thirteen original colonies view those that settled on the fr
    8·1 answer
  • What are Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs)?
    5·1 answer
  • What was dividing the nation when Abraham Lincoln was elected President?
    11·2 answers
  • During the Columbia Exchange, natives of the Americas were introduced to
    6·1 answer
  • Which region has experienced an ongoing struggle with Russia for its independence?
    9·2 answers
  • IN THE TIMER
    15·2 answers
  • Discribe the history of the sport of lacrosse.
    6·1 answer
  • What did historians call someone who wanted independence?
    15·1 answer
  • Read Captain Charles D. Sigsbee’s account of the sinking of the USS Maine, given in 1899. This is a reliable source mainly becau
    11·2 answers
  • The primary difference between the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan was __________. A. military funding B. a standard natio
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!