a. The relationship increased because of the support from Protestant churches.
the Great Awakening affected the colonies by changing many people's attitudes towards religion. Before this revival, religious devoutness had been fading in the colonies. The revival movement undyingly impacted Protestantism as adherents strove to renew individual piety and religious devotion.
The Romantics were so interested in the supernatural because that is what they understood. They believed and trusted in the supernatural. ... Today, a lot of the supernatural beliefs have changed in society. They have changed because individuals do not believe in the elements, as they once did.
It was The Virginia Plan.
The Virginia Plan: Two-house Congress with each state's representation based on state population.
vs.
New Jersey Plan: One-house Congress in which each state had equal representation.
It's clear that one of the systems does not work. Corruption and failure are not strangers to either system, but one of them has a higher success rate to prove its point.
The first argument is pretty simple. Socialism has never worked. From that view, it is pretty clear that empirical evidence suggests that socialism usually ends up turning into an oppressive pseudo capitalist corporatism, as it has happened in South America repeatedly, or it will become a dictatorship, as it has happened in South America, Africa and even to Russia and its neighbor countries.
Socialism, to work, has to have state force using firearms to impose their will upon the others. It smashes the will and freedom of minorities, and by minorities I mean anyone who disagrees with them, and forces them, with the raw and physical power of the State, to behave accordingly.
Capitalism, though, is all about competition and voluntarism when it is not infected with the corrupted politicians that ally themselves with big companies, making an ugly son that we call corporatism. But even when that is the case, people tend to have something to eat, that can't be said about current Venezuela and North Korea.
Answer:There is no universal agreement on the definition of terrorism. Various legal systems and government agencies use different definitions. Moreover, governments have been reluctant to formulate an agreed-upon and legally binding definition. Difficulties arise from the fact that the term has become politically
Explanation:
