Answer:
O Had lost half the land they held in 1881.
Explanation:
The Dawes Act of 1887 was passed by the government of the United States to make native Indians more included in the government and also to possibly open their lands for more white settlers. This law requires the Indian lands to be individualized and distributed among the owners.
What this law led to was that the Indians refused to give up their lands. Moreover, to be included in the citizenship of the nation, they had to 'offer' their lands. This means that only those who accepted the individual plots were granted citizenship, thereby excluding the majority of the American Indians. This resulted in the loss of half of the lands that they had held in 1881.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
Answer:gain control of Florida
Explanation:
Answer:
false
Explanation:
tiresiaa didn't tell him that
Answer:
Limited powers given to the federal government.
Explanation:
U.S. Constitution was a unique combination of political principles because it controls the power of federal government and more was given to the states. The U.S. Constitution controls the power of federal government in order to provide freedom to the citizens and gives limited power to interfere in the lives of its citizen and states. More power was also given to the states in order to protects it from the federal government.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
examples of positive and negative effects of the military regime
The positives are that a military regime is so discipline and strict enough to make people focus and work under heavy scrutiny and supervision to accomplish goals. Many times this is the only path to start to do more and better things, with discipline, perseverance, and order. That is exactly why strict disciplined, without flexibility, is referred to as military discipline. Let's have in mind that soldiers have no room for flexibility, thinking, or feedback. Soldiers simply follow orders and directions.
For instance, General Douglass McArthur's military regime after World War in Japan, trying to help Japan to reconstruct after the two atomic bomb explosions. His military planning goals, plus the focused discipline of the Japanese, made Japan a modern superpower in just a few years.
On the other hand, the negatives. People are no soldiers and like to enjoy their liberties. Under a military regime, there are no liberties. The military is in full command. Many times, under this type of regime, liberties are suppressed or controlled. THis is the opposite of a democracy.
We can see many examples of military regimes in the Middle East and Africa. People have no liberties and many times tyrannic military dictators oppress the citizens.
