The differents situations described in the question have their roots in the consequences of a historical tradition of war of united states of america.
Many historians match that with war comes devastation, depression, deprivation and death. For example during the world war II more than 292.000 American soldiers killed in action. Most of them were father and mother or members of a family.
This produced that many childrens didn't know theirs father, the women awaiting the return of theirs husband, they had to keep the job to survival and others without hope for living because had lost everything.
By the other hand those family situations contributed to an upsurge in divorce , resulting in severe problems among the youngs.
Fish is to school and wolf is to pack. :D
Answer: It was a blueprint for methods of nonviolent protest .
Answer:
The debates over immigration and immigration policy did not develop in recent memory. In fact, one could argue that the debates over this issue date back to antiquity. During Biblical times people did not agree with each other regarding immigration. Even the authors of the Scriptures had different opinions about immigration. Matthew and Paul are two New Testament authors who each discuss the topic of immigration in their writings. Matthew did so in the second chapter of his Gospel, and Paul, in the thirteenth chapter of his letter to the Romans.
In the Gospel of Matthew, the author discusses the story of the birth of Jesus Christ. Some people could argue that this story is an argument in favor of lenient immigration policies and international laws, especially those regarding refugees and asylum. Matthew mentions the dream that Joseph had about “an angel of the Lord” (Matthew 2:13) telling him to flee to Egypt with his wife and their new baby because King Herod was searching for baby Jesus in order to kill him since Herod did not want to believe that Jesus was the Messiah. This dream conversation is important because part of the context of Matthew is trying to convince people that Jesus is the Messiah.
Answer:
"The daylight is coming," Dave said. "We should go now."
Explanation:
In the second option, the phrase "The daylight is coming" is lacking quotation marks. The third option is chaotic because it has no punctuation whatsoever. Finally, the fourth option is nearly perfect, but the comma after said should be a period because "We should go now" is independent from "The daylight is coming."
