All categories

3 years ago

What is (4c-d+0.2)^2-10c; c=3.1, d=4.6

Mathematics

2 answers:

yuradex [85]3 years ago

8 0

Good evening ,

______

Answer:

(4c-d+0.2)² - 10c = 33

___________________

Step-by-step explanation:

(4c-d+0.2)^2-10c

c=3.1, d=4.6

(4(3.1) - 4.6 + 0.2)² - 10(3.1) = (12.4 - 4.6 + 0.2)² - 31 = (7.8 + 0.2)² -31 = 8² - 31 = 64-31 =33.

Dafna1 [17]3 years ago

5 0

Answer: The value of the above expression is 18.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we have given that

$(4c-d+0.2)^2-10c$

Here, c = 3.1

d = 4.6

Put the value in the above expression:

$(4\times 3.1-4.6+0.2)^2-10\times 4.6\\\\=(12.4-4.6+0.2)^2-46\\\\=8^2-46\\\\=64-46\\\\=18$

Hence, the value of the above expression is 18.

You might be interested in

Type the correct answer in each box. Use numerals instead of words. If necessary, use / for the fraction bar(s). Rewrite the fol

never [62]

Vertex Form: y = a(x - h)^2 + k, with (h,k) as the vertex.

To convert it into vertex form, we are going to be completing the square. Firstly, subtract 56 on both sides: $y-56=2x^2-32x$

Next, factor out the GCF, or greatest common factor, of the right side. To find the GCF, list the factors of both terms and the greatest one they share is their GCF. In this case, the GCF is 2: $y-56=2(x^2-16x)$

Next, we want to make what's inside the parentheses a perfect square. To find the constant of the perfect square, divide the x term by 2 and square the quotient. In this case:

-16 ÷ 2 = -8, (-8)² = 64

So you're gonna have to add 64 to the inside of the parentheses. To cancel this out, you will need to add to the other side the product of 64 and 2 (since 64 is inside the parentheses), which is 128: $y+72=2(x^2-16x+64)$

Next, factor the polynomial inside the parentheses: $y+72=2(x-8)^2$

Next, subtract 72 on both sides and your vertex form is $y=2(x-8)^2-72$

Now looking at this vertex form, the vertex is (8,-72), which means that <u>the x-coordinate of the vertex is 8.</u>

6 0

3 years ago

Hello! I graduated in 2008 but forgot how to solve multiplication. It's been so long. However I want to be refreshed on solving

Anettt [7]

To do this you first have to set this up vertically.
First you multiply through with the 2 (44×2=88). Then next, you have to multiply through with the 1 (44×1=44) But since this is the second line, you have to add the 0 to the end (440).
Now you simply add 88+440=528.

5 0

3 years ago

Lalo has 1,500 minutes per month on his cell phone plan. How many more minutes can he use if he has already talked for 785 minut

Mandarinka [93]

He can use 715 minutes for the rest of the month.

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The structure of a two-factor study can be presented as a matrix with the levels of one factor determining the rows and the leve

slega [8]

Answer:

Following are the solution to this question:

Step-by-step explanation:

It provides three different hypotheses in such a two-factor ANOVA:

In point A:

H o: With all factor A levels, the ways are equivalent

Ha: A least another element A level does have a transfer to another

In point B:

Ha: The least one Factor A the level does have a transfer to another

H o: With all Factor B levels the results are about the same.

In point C:

Ha: At most one Variable B level does have a transfer than any other level.

H o: There are no interactions among the factors

Ha: The interactions of factors are important

When ANOVA is executed, they get three p-sets (one for all 3 hypotheses)

(a) If Variable A's p-value is much less alpha, we will reject the null and embrace Ha and infer that Factor A is important. Anything else, H o also isn't rejected and that there is no evidence which Factor A is important

(b) If p- is < alpha, otherwise we reject The null, accept Ha, and infer which Factor B is relevant. Factor B is significant. Conversely, we may not condemn H o but claim there isn't enough proof which Factor B is important

(c)

If they reject H o and agree to the point p- for the A x B interaction is a < alpha Ha, and conclude that the interaction from A to B is important. So, perhaps we can deny H o and claim, that neither proof of interactions is sufficient From A to B.

8 0

3 years ago

5+9(m+5)+8 I dont understand the question may you guys explain

viva [34]

Answer:

Simplify

Step-by-step explanation:

You have to simplify the question:

= 5+9m+45+8

= 50+9m+8

= 58+9m

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is (4c-d+0.2)^2-10c; c=3.1, d=4.6​

What is (4c-d+0.2)^2-10c; c=3.1, d=4.6