What is the greatest common factors of 20,40,50 and 120

Help please, it would mean a ton

Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:

No

Step-by-step explanation:

(5,3) may work for the 2nd equation, but that is not true for the 1st one, thus it can't be your solution

Hope this Helps, Have A Great Day, And Your Welcome!

7 0

3 years ago

If you know that R' (20)=50 and R''(20)=-4, approximate R'(24)

vladimir1956 [14]

Approximate R' by using a linear approximation: for x close enough to 24, you have

R'(x) ≈ L(x) = R' (20) + R'' (20) (x - 20)

Then

R' (24) ≈ R' (20) + R'' (20) (24 - 20) = -4 + 50 (24 - 20) = 196

4 0

3 years ago

Transformation Rule: Translate 4 units right and 3 units up. B Х A

Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Translation of a point (h, k) by 'a' units to the right and 'b' units upwards is defined by,

(h, k) → (h + a, k +b)

Coordinates of A → (-4, -2)

Coordinates of B → (1, -1)

Coordinates of C → (0, -5)

If these points are shifted 4 units right and 3 units up,

By applying rules of the translation,

Coordinates of image point A' → (-4 + 4, -2 + 3)

→ (0, 1)

Coordinates of B' → (1 + 4, -1 + 3)

→ (5, 2)

Coordinates of C' → (0 + 4, -5 + 3)

→ (4, -2)

Now plot these points on the graph.

6 0

3 years ago

True or false? All irrational numbers have some repeating pattern which can

alexgriva [62]

Answer:

Given statement is false.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that,

All irrational numbers have some repeating pattern which can be used to compare them to rational numbers.

We know that,

Rational number :

A rational number is defined such a number which can be written as a ratio.

It means we can write a rational number as a fraction.

For example : 2, 3/2 and 4/2... etc.

In the fraction, both number are4 whole number.

So, we can say that, a number which can be define as a fraction it is called rational number.

Irrational number :

An irrational number is defined such a number which can not be written as a ratio.

For example : √5, √10 and √15...etc

So, we can say that, a number which can not be define as a fraction it is called irrational number.

We need to find all irrational numbers have some repeating pattern which can be used to compare them to rational numbers

According to rational number and irrational number

This statement is false.

Suppose, √2 is irrational but not repeating.

So, we can't write √2 as rational number.

Hence, Given statement is false.

4 0

3 years ago

How do you figure these out?

I am Lyosha [343]

You do them in the order of operations, for example, on the 1st one you did 3x5 first and got 15, and then you added 2 and got a total of 17. On the second one, you did2x4 which is 8 and the you added 3 and made it a total of 11. So basically you do the last 2 boxes first, the add/subtract the first from the total of the other 2.

6 0

3 years ago