Answer:
The differences between Cherokee constitution and US constitution is that the Cherokee was carving out a permanent, independent residence in the United States in the 1820s. The Cherokee nation enacted a Constitution in 1827 that was modeled after the US Constitution, with executive, legislative, and judicial divisions tailored to Cherokee needs. However, the Constitution is the framework for the federal government of the United States. It is the highest form of law in the country. The Constitution creates the branches of government and gives them the power to govern. However, it also protects the citizens of the United States and guarantees their basic rights.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Please mark me as Brainlineast.
Answer:
For centuries Constantinople was seen as great prize because of its important position as the bridge between East and West, because it was the beginning of the valuable silk road to China, and because crucially it had been the seat of power of the Roman Empire after the fall of Rome.
Explanation:
Answer: ima guess D
Explanation:
The Lords Proprietors knew Carolina was too big for just one assembly to govern. ... The distance between the two North Carolina settlements and South Carolina's Charles Town caused the Lords Proprietors decide to split the two areas.
Answer:
The period of conflict and political upheaval in the Republic of Congo is known as Congo Crisis. It began immediately when it got freedom from Belgium and Joseph Desire Mobutu became its dictator, during the crisis he was serving as Chief of staff of the Army. The Congo crisis was an indirect conflict during the Cold War in which Belgium and United states supported Mobutu. More than 90,000 people were killed in the crisis and Mobutu seized power from president Kasavubu in 1965.
The Belgian Congo, French Congo Belge, was the previous settlement in Africa, ruled by Belgium from 1908 until 1960. It was established by the Belgian parliament to supplant the past, exclusive Congo Free State, after worldwide shock over maltreatment there brought weight for supervision and responsibility.
The official Belgian frame of mind was paternalism: Africans were to be thought about and prepared as though they were youngsters. They had no job in enactment, yet customary rulers were utilized as operators to gather charges and enroll work; uncooperative rulers were dismissed. In the late 1950s, when France and the United Kingdom worked with their states to get ready for freedom, Belgium still depicted the Congo as an ideal place that is known for parent-child connections among Europeans and Africans.
