Incomplete/unclear question. The correct question read;
<u>88% </u>of all Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend. P2: Booze-Head is a Rutgers/Newark student. Can it be inductively concluded that Booze-Head will not get drunk this weekend?
Answer:
<u>No</u>
Explanation:
<em>Remember,</em> inductive reasoning is often based on<u> broad generalizations from specific observations.</u>
So since from this scenario, a broad generalization was made that <u>88% </u>of Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend, it seems <u>unlikely </u>and illogical that Booze will not be among those getting drunk on the weekend.
The correct answer for this question is this one:
<span>Life in cities improved in late 1800s and early 1900s. The transportation system has been improved where there are no more steam engines. In fact, the cars are very smart enough already because of the advancement of the technology. The world seems smaller because of this. They were able to connect easily.</span>
Hope this helps answer your question and have a nice day ahead.
To give up some freedoms for protection and security like you can’t just run a red light which means less freedom but the pro is that you with be more safe
i know that 2+2= 4 jdkfkek
Answer:
Akira believes that her son has become a good student because she frequently praises his learning efforts. Her belief best illustrates a behavior perspective.
Explanation:
According to this perspective, when someone's efforts are praised, the tendency to be better is bigger, because the probability to receive the compliment is also bigger. So the person endures a major effort to achieve more accomplishments or to be a better person.