1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AveGali [126]
3 years ago
15

In light of Amendment VI, a 1963 Supreme Court decision in Gideon v. Wainright specified A. the role of courts of civil law. B.

the definition of unreasonable bail. C. a timely trial. D. court-appointed attorneys.
History
2 answers:
RideAnS [48]3 years ago
4 0
<span>In light of Amendment VI, a 1963 Supreme Court decision in Gideon v. Wainright specified court-appointed attorneys. </span>
Novay_Z [31]3 years ago
4 0
The answer is D. court-appointed attorneys
You might be interested in
How do you think the families of Nisei in the military felt about their family member's service?
VLD [36.1K]

Answer:

Honored

Explanation:

To have their children serving the USA made them proud. Despite all of their problems.

5 0
3 years ago
How did Napoleon’s wars affect Latin America?
tester [92]

Answer:

;f wefh eoifh

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Historians are concerned with accuracy of their writings and readings but are also aware of
Vlad1618 [11]

Answer:

but are also aware of biases, perspectives, beliefs, and a variety of other differences.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Government do this goal? give examples.
Damm [24]

Answer:

what do you mean

and goverments goal is to help us and protect us and hold up the law?

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why should historians avoid oversimplifications when analyzing sources?
Mekhanik [1.2K]

Answer:

The correct answer is <u><em>B) Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory  evidence</em></u>

Explanation:

History is not always easy to study and the further we go back, the further we have to rely on second hand or third hand sources.

For example, in order to study something that happened 20 years ago is fairly easy since it would be recorded either in newspapers, books, or even video.

However, it is not always easy to draw conclusions when we are studying an event that took place 2,000 years ago.

Most of them times we rely on information passed on from generations before until finally someone wrote it down.

While many historians get tempted to Over-simply an event to draw certain conclusions, this should not be practiced as it creates a bias and forces us to study or even research for contradictory evidence. Sometimes, this contradictory evidence can completely change our understanding of the event.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The civilization known as Kush arose in Nubia around what time?
    7·1 answer
  • New Mexican civilians supported the war effort by _____________ a. attending the University of New Mexico to earn degrees in wea
    15·2 answers
  • Select all that apply. What three serious problems did Jimmy Carter face during his term of office? A Watergate B Iran Hostage C
    7·2 answers
  • Defend why people follow Fascist leaders?
    5·1 answer
  • What events of recent history led the United States to doubt itself in the 1970’s?
    5·2 answers
  • What was not a factor in the Nazis' increasing popularity in the months leading up to the "Beer Hall Putsch"?
    5·2 answers
  • What made Ivan the Terrible so terrible?
    9·1 answer
  • What region of oklahoma does Grand and Illionis rivers ?
    15·1 answer
  • Answer the following question in 2-3 COMPLETE SENTENCES:
    11·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE NRAINEST TO WHOEVER SOLVES IT CORRECTLY AND FAST
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!