Answer:
0.09 or 9%
Explanation:
This question has some irregularities. The correct question should be :
Elinore is asked to invest $4,900 in a friend's business with the promise that the friend will repay $5,390 in one year's time. Elinore finds her best alternative to this investment, with similar risk, is one that will pay her $ 5,341 in one year's time. U.S. securities of similar term offer a rate of return of 7%. What is the opportunity cost of capital in this case?
Solution
Given from the question
Investment (I) = $4,900
Return on investment (ROI) in one year = $5,341
Rate or opportunity cost of capital r is given by
ROI = I × (1 + r)
input the given data
$5,341 = $4,900 (1 + r)
$5,341 = $4,900 + $4,900r
$5,341 - $4,900 = $4,900r
r = ($5,341 - $4,900) / $4,900
r = 0.09
Or 9% in percentage
Answer:
the ending inventory is $13,200
Explanation:
The computation of the dollar value of the ending inventory under variable costing is shown below:
= Variable production cost per unit × difference in units
= $13.20 per unit × (5,200 units - 4,200 units)
= $13.20 per unit × 1,000 units
= $13,200
hence, the ending inventory is $13,200
The answer is net income
Net income is the amount of capital that the Company's made during an operational year after all relevant expenses have already been deducted.
Some amount of the net income will be shared to shareholders according to the percentage, and some of it will be put in company's capital to expand the operation.
Answer:
This has no effect on the period-end balance sheet.
Explanation:
A statement of the assets, liabilities, and capital of a business or other organization at a particular point in time, detailing the balance of income and expenditure over the preceding period.
According to the question asked the balanced sheet was prepared before the pay period came so this effect will not affect the balance sheet.
Answer:
- I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting and do some research.
Explanation:
<em>I think Ben is right</em>. Even though the statement is technically correct, it may mislead customers.
Customers may interpret the phrase "<em>no sugar added</em>" as if the product did not contain any sugar.
Thus, customers interested in drinking beverages without sugar at all might think they are "safe" consuming the smoothie beverage, when in reallity each <em>smoothie's bottle contains sugar 35 g of naturally occurring sugars from the fruit.</em>
Customers deserve to be certain on what they are buying, thus the labels must be a sincere help for them, and not ambiguos at all.
This is a "gray zone" and an example of what in ethics is called a dilema.
I think the decision should be shared by a wider team and based on some research.
I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting, where the subject is widely discussed. Also, I would suggest Ben to do some research, look for precedents about labeling in the industry, and try to learn the opinion of the FDA about this sensitive matter.
