1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natka813 [3]
3 years ago
13

What was a major difference between Spanish and English colonists?

History
2 answers:
OlgaM077 [116]3 years ago
7 0
They were english and spanish
DaniilM [7]3 years ago
6 0

Spanish settlers came to America in search Gold to improve their economic stability, to spread Catholic faith in America, and to conquer America and extend their borders.

British colonists came as families of apprentice servants and they were huge in number so, the British colonies had an enormous manpower. They settled in America in search of religious liberty as they were the Protestants, they needed religious security.

Spanish colonies were small, so they were not given opportunities to work. They were in search of gold whereas English cultivated crops and sold tobacco.  

You might be interested in
1. insert the correct verb form for the following sentence?
sasho [114]

Answer:

1 is C

2 is A

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Develop an argument that evaluates the factors that led to the rise and fall of Islamic empires during the early modern era.
Masja [62]

Answer and Explanation:

Some of the factors that led to the rise and fall of the Islamic empires during the early modern era are clearly evaluated here. My argument gives a clear overview of the issue from the very beginning —during the rise of the empire, to the supposed end—during the fall of the empire.

Islam spread through military conquest, trade, pilgrimage, and missionaries. The Arab Muslim forces conquered large territories and built imperial structures over time to secure those territories. Most of the significant expansion of the empire happened during the reign of the Rashidun from 632 to 661 CE, which was the reign of the first four successors of Muhammad.

Then, the caliphate—a new Islamic political structure now evolved and became more sophisticated in the era of the Umayyad and Abbasid caliphates.

Here are the factors:

1. Accordance of non-Arabs with secondary status.

During the earlier Umayyad Dynasty (661-750 CE), non-Arabs were given secondary status.

2. Influence of Persian culture on the Abbasid Court.

During the Abbasid Dynasty (750-1258), distinction between Arab Muslims and non-Arab Muslims diminished with the Persian culture's great influence on the Abbasid Court.

3. Increased Political Involvements

With the Abbasids, more non-Arabs and non-Muslims became involved in government administration. This resulted into the decision of the Caliphate, which led to the formation of many fragmented political entities, some of which were actively led by non-Arab Muslims.

All these factors and more led to the fall of the Islamic empire in this modern era.

6 0
3 years ago
What was the title of the man who was the head of the eastern orthodox church
Colt1911 [192]
The answer is: The Byzantine emperor.

I hope this helps. 

Have a nice day. 

^-^
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Match the following definitions with your vocabulary words.
ANEK [815]
1. C
2. A
3. B
4. D

Incumbent is someone who currently holds office ( 3 is B) And so 4 will be D. Because they are 'losing' in #2 the answer is A (defeat). And when Congress can pass legislation they must have the majority (1 is C).
8 0
3 years ago
Which Persian leader do you think made the biggest contribution
torisob [31]
Cyrus' conquest was relatively humane compared to empires preceding his, such as the Babylonians and Assyrians. He allowed many areas of his empire a great deal of autonomy, rather than centrally controlling things. This distributed leadership allowed Persia to cover a greater geographical area than previous empires in that era and still be fairly stable, since most of its subjects were content to remain under Persian rule. Persian law was more codified and less arbitrary than previous empires; the king's seal declared approval of law which could only be reversed by further approved decrees -- not quite rule of law but going in that direction. 
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In what way did Congress continue the work of the Constitutional Convention? What "gaps" in the Constitution did Congress fill?
    13·1 answer
  • Write two sentences how Marxism differs from your understanding of capitalism
    15·2 answers
  • What are two events that caused Americans to become disillusioned with the Federal government during the first half of the '70s?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did many Italians support Mussolini during the Great Depression? (5 points
    10·1 answer
  • Analyze the map below and answer the question that follows. The main economic activity that occurs in the US regions circled on
    5·1 answer
  • What’s the difference between unitary, confederate, and federal government?
    10·1 answer
  • What western u.s. border was established by the treaty of Paris 1783?
    7·1 answer
  • In a lifestyle based on agriculture rural people lived in small bonds of 25 do 250 people. True or false​
    9·1 answer
  • What contributed to the rise of Mwenautapa? (1 point)
    9·1 answer
  • How was the constitution created? Kinda forgot that’s why
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!