Which of the following was an important consequence of the Renaissance?

History

2 answers:

yarga [219]3 years ago

8 0

The correct answer is C) The gulf between the learned minority and uneducated majority increased.

An important consequence of the Renaissance was the gulf between the learned minority and uneducated majority increased.

Renaissance in Europe renovated the interest in popular Greek and Roman ideas that were lost during the Middle Ages. It recognized the importance of the heritage of the Greeks and Romans. During the Renaissance, intelligent men, artists, and inventors produced a great amount of knowledge but unfortunately only the wealthy and educated had access to this knowledge. It was not for everybody.

lozanna [386]3 years ago

3 0

C. the correct answer

You might be interested in

Which statement best describes an advantage of indirect democracy over direct democracy

MakcuM [25]

Indirect democracy is is best over democracy because Indirect democracy does not need to tell their followers or leaders(ig) everything they will do. Therefore Indirect democracy is Better.

5 0

2 years ago

Which best describes how Cleisthenes’s reforms in Athens set important precedents for later governments?

shusha [124]

Answer:

it's because He widened the part played by ordinary citizens in Athens’ government.

Cleisthene was known as the reformer athen's constitutiton in 500 BC. This reformation marked the beginning of the Athenian Democracy, where the people could be involved in the decision making process by the Government. His method is adopted by almost all modern countries today.

Explanation:

pls give brainliest

5 0

2 years ago

I need 5 social studies questions

BigorU [14]

Answer:

Why did france want to control the land at the mouth of the mississippi river?

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The official being impeached is tried by the

sergeinik [125]

Answer:

B. The House Of Representatives

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Write a paragraph explaining what you would have done differently if you were a member of Congress or the president during the e

scoundrel [369]

Answer:

If I were President, I would establish my plan with different congresspeople from both parties to gain their support and not lose the honor of the congress. The reason being that Johnson attempted to implement reconstruction in his own way against the will of the congress, believing that he would be able to finish it all and position southern congressmen before the congress came out of recess and back into action, which was his mistake, because as soon as the congress came back into session, he was defeated. I would compromise and assure them of my support while attempting to gain legislative approval.

Explanation:

This is my opinion only so please feel free to alter as you see fit.

6 0

1 year ago